Hypothetical

You'd probably have no fatalities, only injuries.

Nope. People can't breath on fire. They die in seconds. That's why they used them in WW2.

If you do a livestream, please have some Sven playing
youtube.com/watch?v=ZNuH0VYN8ZI

>youtube.com/watch?v=ZNuH0VYN8ZI

Flamethrowers aren't designed to be fatal, would likely just make em look like ghouls. I probably shoulda specified UK not europe because euros are gay

Glownigger is glowing

wearethemighty.com/articles/heres-why-flamethrowers-were-so-deadly-on-the-battlefield-for-both-sides


Just put the tank in a large backpack and strap up for a wild ride. 2 x 10 L should last about 15 minutes.


Wrong

You are illiterate.

realcleardefense.com/articles/2014/10/30/the_horrific_effectiveness_of_flamethrowers_107520.html

And then what? You enrage the ones you didnt kill and the world ignorantly gives them sympathy and support - then what have you accomplished? Not a fucking thing. In fact you've made it worse for the rest of us that have to put up with the non-sense.

To really destroy an enemy you must destroy them from within. You need to find a way to start internal conflict and let them do themselves in. Expose ALL their bullshit. Play the LONG game, not the "Im an angry cuck and gonna kill me some muzzies" game. We need warriors, not throwaway bodies. Plenty of those to go around.

Yeah but instead

Catch a whole gaggle of fighting aged men hanging out in one of their neighborhoods or roving in a pack together through a whiter one, pull up in front of them, blocking their path, open the van's sliding door and blaze'em
A Cinna Gaugeā„¢ is also a very nice option

Attached: 1526265149543.jpg (616x1024, 97.55K)