Debating Against Abortion

Can't argue with that

Well a fetus scientifically is not a human so…

You need a better argument

By the way, even if it was a human, it would still not necessarily be wrong to support abortion

If you are pro-life in good faith that means you are against abortion even in the case of rape (since there is no way to verify whether a woman was raped in a timely manner, notwithstanding the fact that it would be humiliating and disgraceful to ask a woman to "prove" she was raped)

to win the debate? say it disproportionately targets blacks killing millions of niggers every year. Now you can see why abortion isn't so bad after all>>13098146
not proportionally they do, black women are 5-6% of the population and 1/3 the abortions? Do you honestly think a mother who would murder her child, would be a good mother if forced to have the baby? Get real

I am antiabortion. What a single woman does is her choice.

What race is it?

Ask them how they feel about drug use during pregnancy or why an infant or child that is just as dependent on other people for food is intrinsically different in this aspect to a fetus. If they're libtards, you can also ask them what differs people on welfare from parasites, if human dependency is tantamount to the dependent human being of no more worth than a tape worm.

All true, but abortion is still a net good to the white race, because it kills a lot of niglets and halfbreeds. Non-whites should be allowed, even encouraged to have abortions because they aren't human and have always practiced infanticide. They can't help it and there's no reason why we should try to stop them. College educated, white career thots who get abortions are already a lost cause. They would likely be raised by a single mom and pushed into faggotry by her. If we want to minimize white abortions they focus needs to be on stable marriages, involved fathers in the home, and a strong brotherhood of white men that promote the conditions that benefit men as fathers. That would bring the white abortion rate lower than trying to make it illegal, while still allowing non-whites to kill as many of their babies as they please.

HIV/AIDS IS A POPULATION CONTROL OPERATION
Prior to the HIV/AIDS psyop, most White children were born unplanned.
This was a serious problem for the kikes, as persuading White women not to deliberately conceive and instead to pursue the "career" is only half of the battle, and a certain fraction will never abort their child.
What's the solution? HIV/AIDS.
By spending BILLIONS on drumming "safe sex"it's 'safe' for the kikes, because it doesn't create new Whites, which they consider a danger to their plans and especially condom usage into the minds of young people all the way through school, college and beyond, the kike hoped to cut down on unplanned pregnancies and thereby deal a heavy blow to White fertility.
If you're with a girl you'd like to have a child with, stop using condoms. Women hate them anyway.
You cannot catch HIV from a White woman who isn't in a high-risk group. Less than 50 cases are reported per year as a result of White-White hetero-hetero low risk - low risk intercourse. That's about the same chance as being struck by lightning.
You didn't read the small print.
The big number is for partners belonging to a high risk group, or prediagnosed HIV+.
In fact the number of cases for White men who select low risk White female partners, is so low that it doesn't even get its own bar on the chart, they (the CDC) has to lump it in with "other causes" such as hemophilia.
tl;dr start barebacking your bird today.

That chart still shows that nigs still get abortions at disproportionate rates compared to whites. Therefore outlawing abortions in the US today would actually contribute to a larger nig\white baby ratio. The answer is to encourage abortion and family planning to "women of color".>>13098146

besides any woman wanting to kill their baby are probably single mother half breeds that would raise weak men anyway