Do you sometimes wonder if it's us that are wrong?

Barging in with nothing but a reaction image and no clear context contributes is literally as valuable as spamming a random sequence of emoji. Or keyboard mashing. Or incomprehensible engrish.
The very fucking least you could do is give us a smug greentext to go with it, with at least a /hint/ of what your problem with him is.
Absolutely noone understands what you're talking about beyond that you don't like that posters post for some completely unspecified reason. You look like a 10 year old who jumps in at random with 'lul no UR MOM xD'.

Wtf Lenin was white and based, shame he didn't name the jew and save Europe

Maybe try being less of a faggot

Do you mean that workers conditions today are the same as the ones in the ninenteenth century? If not explain to me in which way they are comparable in less ambiguous terms.


I have often read this in this imageboard, and im starting to belive that you heard that argument somewhere else, probably from someone stuck in the the past and foolishly waiting for Marx's predictions to realize, and yall unquestioningly follow it without actually engaging with the frankfurt school. If this is not the case for you, what it is that makes you have critical theory in such a low regard? And when i ask this question i espect something other than they were all bourgeois obscure academics, because that does not prove anything about their theory, even if it was true.
In fact, frankfurt school had a decisive influence in the left movements culminating in the famous may of 1968. Specially Marcuse was an activist holding lectures which developed class conciousness among students. He also teached some really influencial activists such as Angela Davis, who also studied Kant's philosophy under the lessons of Adorno. You must be completely blind or prideful to not see the school's influence.

Attached: static1.squarespace.com.jpg (1440x808 64.71 KB, 192.44K)

i deeply respect your way of speech since it is so rare see someone talking in a way that doesnt include all kinds of attempts in humilliation, not that i find it too disgusting, but because it doesnt make any actual arguments.
However, i belive that it is negative thought (by negativity i do not mean violence, i mean a process of self-negation at the very least or self-disgust if possible) that inspires most of intellectual growth, since positivity do not represent a threat to your actual intellectual state. On the other hand, being negativity makes us go further, since it is uncomfortableness that has always been the most fertile source of inspiration, out of nonconformity man has always seen progress, individual and collective. In my experience, positivity has lead me to be more passive and conformist, so i do not think that you should avoid "spreading negative energies without convincing others but leaving them hopeless with my polemics", since the negativity you are spreading would be good to the people hearing you words, they have to feel bad with themselves because they are disgusting as they are right now, and negativity is love of one's best potential version.
Bad feels are not essentialy bad if they make you better yourself, i even think that they must be sought after in the intellectual realm.

Tekmil (report) can be initiated by everyone and anytime in Rojava. It's about the principle of Hevalti (companionship) to develop together by sophisticated critique and self-criqitue. You build a circle and the one who speaks steps forward, makes her/his statement and steps back again. Then, the next speaks, so without any answers of others. This method is necessary to improve the individuals and the collective efficiently and make each others thoughts transparent without the danger of getting punished or alike because you cannot get attacked by others and everyone has the time to reflect the thoughts of others. You try to transcend your egological self and take a more intersubjective perspective. In the end, you can suggest improvements, ideads and such. youtu.be/Sf7Til6-ZOA?t=2115 related but it's not very elaborated because they are quite new companions.


This is a perfect example what Tekmil isn't.


Negative feelings lead to avoidance which instead leads us isolated. But I can feel your argument, this is why I went that road. Maybe I have to mix both or even better: be more factual, non-judgemental and only use well-verbalized punchlines.

It's really simple. In fact, it's right there in that bit of greentext: (alienated labor, value form, commodity production, wage labour). Their nature has not changed.

I am not that guy, but I have an answer to that one. Critical theory tries to apply a scientific method to unscientific subjects. As such, it is prone to fallacious reasoning eg. Capitalism produced Concept X, therefore Concept X is an integral component of Capitalism.

You say that in reply to a post which states: "the only people who give a shit about it professors who shit out tl;dr books for a living, and their clueless undergrad followers."

Fuck that FBI plant. Don't think we didn't notice what happened when she got arrested.

That's pretty cute but I don't think it would work online.

Anyway here's my self-criticism: I consume books instead of properly engaging them. Even if I take notes I have a hard time reconstructing what I have just read. Some parts usually stick to me but I can't seem to comprehend books as a whole.

Attached: 0ac196ee9b631f75a9bb25cdec4c6955ec4cbf0a.jpg (845x1199, 194.67K)

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES