There should be buckets of teeth at museums. Where did all of the teeth go? In Cambodia teeth turn up after a heavy rain. Also why don't we see the Jews morn the victims of communism? Why do jews such as the Krystols love communism but get angry when you point out that the leadership was jewish?
WE MUST DESTROY THE NARRATIVE OF THE HOLOCAUST!
Jackson Anderson
Juan Gonzalez
All you semites have teamed up against whites, ksg yourself.
Cameron Roberts
It has to be more subtle than this, many I tried to redpill recoiled instantly at even approaching the topic. The programming is real and deep, and linking them websites or infographics normally has the opposite effect and makes them run away.
I simply like to mention it offhand and casually when it comes up in discussion, like "oh we're talking about the holocaust? yeah it didn't happen". The more nonchalant and unashamed you are of it, the less visceral the reaction. Act like it's not a big deal.
Of course, when eventually questioned, say something like "I looked into it for a long time, I was curious, it's all a lie I'm afraid". Then they'll say something like "but muh evidence!". This is where the socratic method is useful. Ask them what they /actually/ know about the holocaust, and where they got the information. Ask them if they can name any camps, how many camps there were, when did it begin, how did it end, who was the guy in charge?
They will splutter after every failed answer. Make them feel a bit dumb. Then answer these questions yourself, make it clear that you know much more about this than they do, that you are the intellectual authority on this matter. My line I like to use is " you really don't know much about it at all, everything you know is from Schindler's List and Anne Frank… those aren't real sources, that's not history, it's propaganda".
Also I like to throw in the "why are you so mad about this? Isn't it a GREAT thing that 6 million jews weren't actually killed? Genocide is terrible, this is GOOD news!"
After this, stop. Don't go too hard and too fast, you'll ruin it all. Change the topic to something more lighthearted and leave, but never apologise or back down. The seed has been planted, this is enough. Just simply MEETING a holocaust realist and hearing some of the rhetoric is enough for many to stop being so scared of even approaching this topic. Top points if you're an attractive chad too, they'll really begin to second guess themselves; teach by example.
But yes, show them you're not ashamed of admitting it. Bravery and personal conviction goes a long way in convincing.
Daniel Carter
This sounds great, but how would this be done on a large scale? Obviously, redpilling people one person at a time isn't a very efficient method.
Jose Hill
true except for the word holocaust. the "holocaus" never ever happened
Mason Fisher
R_thedonald is losing more and more influence on cuck/pol/
Brayden Wilson
The Holocaust is real and your antisemitic hate is why this website is going to be shut down. Trust me, I work for the ADL
Grayson Mitchell
Mind giving us the date you are?
I am pretty sure a lot of anons are aware it will be shut down one day rabbie.
Parker Davis
There's a lot of sense in this, this narrative needs to be smashed, but so do a couple of others, namely: slavery and the Crusades.
These three narratives are used to foster guilt and self-hatred among Europeans and to promote multiculti.
In all three cases, the wisest course of action may to to begin by challenging the uniqueness of these events, drawing equivalence to other historical "injustices". It's important to begin not with denials that these things happened (you'll just be dismissed as an ebil nahtsee), but with discussions about things that normies can easily find trustworthy information about and that can't be flat-out denied.
has the right idea. People must be taught about equivalent events and then made to think about why certain events are rammed down our throats all the time and certain other events are rarely discussed.
For the Holocaust, bring up Holodomor. Ask people why the former is supposed to be worse than the latter (those Ukrainians died a horrible death of starvation). Emphasise that Holodomor is not taught because the winners write history. The Germans lost, so the allied nations didn't hesitate to charge them with terrible crimes. The Soviets won, so they got away with what they did. The Armenian genocide may be useful to bring up as well (and Kim Kardashian adds some star power to this). The Armenian genocide has the benefit of being carried out by Muslim Turks against Christians.
Regarding the slave trade, emphasise the Barbary and Crimean slave trades, where millions of Europeans were enslaved in Africa and the Middle East:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Some slave raids went as far north as Iceland:
en.wikipedia.org
Ask people why we don't learn about these things. Tell people that a lot of European women (especially the blonde ones) and even some young boys were taken as sex slaves.
Additionally, point out that the Africans enslaved in America were not actually captured by Europeans because Europeans were incapable of conducting such large-scale slave raids in inner Africa at that time (for bonus points, say that the assumption that Europeans went around catching blacks in nets is based on racist beliefs about European superiority). Emphasise that the African slaves were mostly captured by other Africans, in many cases being pagan Africans who were captured by Muslims conducting jihad.
Bernard Lewis's "Race and slavery in the Middle East: an historical enquiry" may be a very useful source for the role that Islam has in slavery. There's a very good argument that the very idea of enslaving black people was brought to Europeans by contact with Muslims (who had been enslaving blacks for a long time).
Regarding the Crusades, this is all you need:
youtube.com
One people realize that what they've been taught about the world by the media and educational system is cherry-picked in such a way as to make Europeans appear comparatively worse, they'll be slightly red-pilled and more willing to take further red pills as they start to ask *why* Europeans are slandered and whether the narratives based on this slander are reliable.
Easton Phillips
>>>/pdfs/820
>>>/pdfs/820
>>>/pdfs/820
>>>/pdfs/820