We use words like faggot, kike, and nigger because it imbues our posts with a hateful, burning conviction that is all our own. It can not be emulated by the subhuman filth raiding these boards because they post with the bitter conceit and envy while we post with nothing but the struggle in our minds.
Do not name the JEW
Jeremiah Edwards
Blake Cook
the life of OP
Tyler Barnes
Three times yes, but this is a fight of survival for our ecosystem, so anything goes if it stops us from destroying it, because if we succeed in destroying our host…everything dies. The ecosystem must survive so that's why an even more dangerous anti-body was created. It's a race now and if humans survive the jews, then their lies fall apart, which brings the natural laws back on the table, and hopefully stops humanity from destroying what sustains their lives. Meanwhile the ecosystem itself is also failing, thanks to the destruction of the animal kingdom, and the pollution of water, soil and air. Everything is cascading now and we will see more and more negative side-effects of our actions. It's quite spectacular if it weren't so intense of a topic.
Tyler Campbell
sage
Xavier Adams
Read the words of a poet from a hundred years ago. You have never met them, you only know about them through other humans, yet from seeing their art you know something of their state of mind, their beliefs, their values. The created shows aspects of the Creator.
Something cannot come from nothing.
You didn't understand what I was getting at. What makes something positive or negative? Why should people not see positive things as virtue? If positive things are virtuous and come from nature, and nature comes from God; then we can see what God created as virtue and base 'laws/rules/virtues' on it. It's not some big bogeyman laws to oppress people in a 'religion of control'; its a logical extension of our understanding.
Disregarded.
Whatever, I'll take it.
You are essentially making the exact same argument as me here, so nice. I wouldn't call us parasites, but I do agree we need to embrace the Natural Law / AKA God's law to survive and prosper.
If we use sin instead of corruption, you would be sounding like a priest
Semantics.
If we lived in a vacuum then it is possible for there to be no disease or sickness. With no disease or sickness, there is only 'health'. Without disease or sickness we probably wouldn't bother to call ourselves 'healthy', and without them we probably wouldn't have words for disease or sickness; but that does not mean that such a state of perfect health is impossible.
Use the previous example. Everyone was healthy, and then a disease came and killed a load of people. It was the first disease ever encountered. Before it there was no disease. The disease came about because someone did something that they shouldn't have (maybe put their junk inside of a monkey). That is what I'm talking about here. It's the Adam and Eve story; everything was good and everyone was healthy, then the devil convinces them to disobey God introducing sin/disobedience/evil/corruption/whatever into the world, and now we all die (for the wages of sin are death). Its a very easy to understand concept with many analogies.
…
Followed by
Nice human explanation you made up there. What you call nature is what many people have called God for a long time.
That seems to go against your natural laws by the way.
Not at all. God creates everything including Satan, but God gave Satan (and Man) free will. Satan chose to go against God's plan and used things in ways they were not supposed to be used (eg. Junk in monkey). That is disobedience. That is sin. That is corruption. Whatever you want to call it.
And yet we desire to stop it and we work to stop it and we seek to immortalise ourselves in one way or another, and as far as we know from history; we always have. I cannot prove to you that there is an afterlife, but from studying nature and instinct we have learned a lot about how things work in the world, and it is not an insane hypothesis to think that our other desires, even though they seem to be and always have been fruitless, are there for a reason. The underlying hand of the Creator is obvious to all who look. Something cannot come from nothing, and all that is Created indicates a specific Creator.
You actually are a religious man whether you know it or not. What you call Nature or the Natural Laws are pretty much exactly what people consider to be God's laws and are based upon more or less the exact same reasoning. You have your own myths to explain away the parts that you have no good answer for (nature has always been, opposites must coexist, etc) and you align yourself with trying to live in a virtuous/moral (healthy/prosperous) way.
Jack Hernandez
You don’t understand the paradigm.
We are truth. National Socialism is truth.
They are anti-truth. They use fake words and lies.
We tell the truth.
We will win.
Luke Taylor
Truth will out
Mason Torres
The product of a somewhat healthy blood and race line, out of which came exceptional traits, which he used to create in accordance with the laws of nature for the benefit of his collective. That's all natural progression, like a gorilla who's extra strong and can protect his group even better.
Because nothing does not exist. The baby of the future is the seed and the eggs of the present. Everything exists, it represents the sum of all things, and out of it we create. We don't create out of nothing. If you don't believe me then tell me something that is nothing. You can't, because nothing is a lie.
Natural law of opposites. Positive and negative, hot and cold, life and death. If something exists then it has an opposite.
Because your feelings have no sway in truth. It's just your interpretations. It's like saying death sucks, doesn't change anything, doesn't it?
Strike the word "oppression", because that's again just your feeling about something, and the rest is absolutely true. It's the foundation of existence, fundamental laws that cannot be broken, and are detrimental for everything that exists. Your interpretations, the virtue you see in them, have no influence whatsoever. A stone has no consciousness, no emotions, an no connections to any religions explanations, yet it follows natural law by being created, by existing and by having and end.
Humans are pathological liar, they can't even comprehend the lie about individuality. hell, they can't even comprehend the big jewish elephant on the global stage that is trying to murder them. And here you talk about logical understanding. And btw the people back in the Moses days were doubtfully standing on the smartest side of human history either. None of your arguments make any logical sense.
I wouldn't even have a problem with you putting a deity over nature, but if you can't understand the lie behind it, then you're following the laws of men and these are destructive to nature, so you're not helping nature at all by being ignorant. If any religion was in accordance with the laws of nature, I would accept the lie as a means to control, as long as it keep the natural order. But as it is humanity acts parasitical while being exploited from within by another parasite, and religion makes you blind to both sides. That is not survival, and thereby against the laws of nature.
Not all scripture is wrong. Using them to teach morality is a good thing, if it's the right morality (nature). I have nothing against the idea of religious worshiping at all.
We would have absolutely no immune system and could be killed by dust, and since natural law has this hilarious little principle called "chance" there is always a chance for things to fuck up, no matter how much you control it. Also look at the human history of anything to see that it never quite worked out, so you talking about perfection is akin to dreaming. It's totally unrealistic.
Evan Davis
The apple was always there, the snake was there. They both already existed but weren't used for "evil" yet. Even if you ignore the snake nonsense, the apple would've been eaten eventually, because temptation exists and it always lures. It was only a question of time for someone to bite into it. It's all natural laws. Evil has always existed, good just didn't fell for it yet. They cannot exist by themselves.
Imagine a bunch of antelopes, a little lake, and some alligators. That's the sum of all things. Each of the three has it's own way of life, it's own traits, it's own struggle to survive. Putting them together creates rules, laws, behavior patterns. They learn from each other, they live from each other, they give to each other. After a while a law of the land is created out of the sum of all things. Just like that. You can literally see it happen (if you have enough time on your hands). No imaginary creator necessary.
And everything humans know comes from nature. We were born into this ecosystem, and our understanding and comprehension comes from learning from the nature around us. Then at a certain point we claimed that that now doesn't count anymore, because we have gods now. That's horse shit. Nature is still around while many of these gods are long forgotten, and yet it's 2019 and you say "but this god is totally the real deal because everyone knows about him for so long" Meanwhile nature exists for like millions of years, in a timeline where humanity doesn't even make a dent. Where is the logic in your line of thinking?
Nope. It's again about the sum of all things creating together. It doesn't require a creator to be a participant in creation. For example: when you make a child then you're not the only creator. The food in your bellies, the air that you breath, the guys who created the bed that you lie in etc. All these things are part of the creation happening. That's what an ecosystem is about.
I answer the rest tomorrow, reality demands me.
Blake Stewart
Shut up, kike faggot.