Democracy is the solution

Confirmed for ignorant fuck. Democracy doesn't work with uneducated masses, and it doesn't last long anyway as it is always replaced by an oligarchy.

Democracy will always be "hijacked" because that's all it's good for. Every ideology that "isn't true *insert ideology here*" is garbage that can't maintain itself and will always be corrupted by nefarious forces away from a pure idealistic form that only exists in the minds of fools.

this
kys OP
(((Democracy)))

Anything short of direct democracy is pointless and will have the same failure points. Direct democracy only works on a small scale and as part of a wider culture.
Dictatorship works better on the large scale.

fucking off by 1

I often wonder what would have happened if the brexit referendum had been some kind of immigration referendum instead.

I was actually thinking about this and I figured dictatorships work in the short term to put things back on track, like in the Roman Republic. As a long term governmental model, it's tenuous. I've been keeping an eye on dictatorships like China and I noticed they immediately fall into infighting and coups and struggles for powers between factions that have crippled them. I'm not entirely sure on direct democracy's functions, however, I haven't done much research into it.

A lot of this thread is coloured by how retarded the concept of modern america is. 350 million people, what a joke
If anything the opposite is true. Republics fall into dictatorship all the time. They wouldn't function if not for that. Lincoln and so on.
k

forgot to reply

A Republic doesn't always fall into dictatorship so as long as a balance of power and law and order are maintained. Countries like China do not have that, China is incredibly unstable and could collapse if the economy or the government fucks up too badly to function. How the Chinese government handles controversies and internal strife is more maintaining the stability of the party over the well being of the Chinese people, and committing cultural genocide and oppression of said people who do not spew the party's lines. Like in Tibet or in the Cultural Revolution, it just simply doesn't work as well. A Republic can stand, it turns to a dictatorship when Democracy is introduced, since Democracy is mob rule and that mob can be easily controlled.
No government, realistically, lasts forever. A Republic becomes a Dictatorship becomes a Monarchy becomes a Republic, often it's more a cycle. I believe, however, the most telling issues involving authoritarianism is rather or not said leader has the interests of the people in heart. That's what I admire about Hitler and his work, he did care for the German people, but the authoritarian model is not one meant to last. Especially with the advent of the internet, it makes it harder to keep under control issues that are harmful to the stability of that authoritarian model. This is why I believe a Republic, with well established rules and balances, can work so as long as it's not either democratic or run by non-white men.