Was the destruction of the Islamic golden age really justified?

I literally told you how to make an argument and you still failed. Are you going to actually state how anything I said is wrong, or keep making the assertion that I am wrong without telling me how in the false belief that it makes people think that you are winning the argument?

You're on Zig Forums shitskin. People here aren't going to go 'awww look at the little subhuman pretending at being an intellectual'. You actually have to make an argument and be able to back it up. So make an argument or do us all a favour and piss off back to goatfuckistan.

Interesting argument. I recommend this gloriously British fucker as a sort of counter. His argument is that atheists largely exist because of mutations that are disadvantageous to survival, and that evolution would therefore select against them.

So the short answer is: yes, Christianity will probably not be loyal to you, but the important point to note is that it is natural and advantageous for our ethnic group to be religious, and as such really you should be trying to align yourself with what your group needs as opposed to hoping that your ethnic group, which is still majority Christian (and is massively so when it comes to those who are going to pass on their genes), is going to hamper its own chances at survival to sate your twisted beliefs concerning the divine. Even if you do not actually believe in God or Christianity, you should recognise religions importance for ethnic survival and as such stop trying to undermine others and only worrying about how 'they might reject me because I insist on being a social pariah!'.

If you want someone to blame, Genghis Khan obliterated Baghdad - in fact, that region's population recovered to pre-Genghis numbers just a few decades ago.

Pretty sure the invasion of Europe lead to that.

Spreading Arab paganism, while it would be effective against the jews there is only one ancient book on it written by Muslims denouncing their pagan past. The rest of Arab "paganism" lives within the tribal stories of primarily Bedouin tribes who act outwardly Muslim but still hold onto some of the old idols, one would have to interview all of them to figure out the Ancient Arab ways. Coincidentally the War in Syria has probably caused a huge loss of their collective tribal memory. I only know of one Arab "pagan" though, I doubt while you live you'll be able to break any Arabs from their jewish yoke Religion.

Muslims brought it upon themselves. That is the cycle of Karma returning evil unto evil. Now once more you bed with the kikes for a chance at world conquest.

Yes, I can see the need for shared history and culture, but to go further: Christianity did not work. Europe and America have been Christian for a long time, but look where we are.

Do you know who Jesus is? If you take away the mythology, he was a Jewish man who started a cult that utilizes "Believe and obey to get a reward, disobey or disbelieve and get a punishment," type psychological tricks to get people to obey essentially anything that the religion commands.

This cult was invented to defeat the enemy that was currently occupying the land where Jesus lived: Judea.
The Jews needed to defeat Rome without actually physically fighting.

The Jews, or a singular Jew, invented a memetic viral cult that would spread quickly in order to turn normal Roman citizens into submissive, meek, weak people, and shortly after, just as planned, Rome fell, and soon, all of Europe fell as well, and we call that the dark ages.
Some say the dark ages really weren't that bad. But the dark ages weren't the period of grand technological development: That was after the Renaissance or enlightenment, where people became less religious generally.

So truthfully, I do not quite believe that Christianity is in any way benevolent. The first thing I did when I turned atheist was to look back angrily at the cult of Christianity, and immediately see that it spawned from Judaism, and that Islam also spawned from Judaism.

Clearly, Jews have an odd capacity to manufacture religions, and these religions all make the followers weak, meek, and submissive.

Beyond just that, Christianity plays the same game as Islam: It's destroyed Pagan heritage sites, suppresses heretical philosophy and science, and forces itself down everyone's throat, using malicious money-making schemes like tithes to fund its propaganda machine. For instance, are you a Christian? Is that why you spread it? Or are you an atheist just trying to spread what you think is a good and popular philosophy? If you're a Christian, I recommend that you more deeply question what you hope to achieve by spreading such a cult here.

So please do consider what you believe. As I said before, I am significantly more fond of European pagan traditions, as Christianity seems to be "just another" Jewish invention deliberately devised to destroy our culture and people.

Did I touch a nerve, Chaim? Did I fuck up your shilling? LMFAO, try adding some new plays to your playbook.

You missed out quite a few important things. Firstly, that this is God; the Creator who made our reality. Secondly, His name is Truth. At this point all you have previously stated about obedience to the religion at the cost of divine punishment begins to look a lot better. No longer is it "You must sacrifice 8 oxen on the second moon of the fourth month or your crops will die"; now its telling us that the world around us was made by God, that we can understand God through nature, that we should be seeking to align ourselves with what is True, and to do otherwise is disobedience which is something that should be avoided (although there is repentance and mercy for those who seek to redeem themselves).

This perspective, markedly different from that of islam; allowed for Christian science to become a thing. Science as we know it actually began as Theology, that is it started off with religious men seeking to understand God better by examining His Creation; thus biology, physics, chemistry and all the rest. Your mischaracterisation here borders on the perverse honestly, though I shall give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you just bought into typical jewish BS.

Pure speculation. Whether it was or was not, it has become the most defining aspect of White culture, and every virtue and moral has infused itself with Christianity, finding justifications and explanations in the works of countless philosophers and theologians throughout the past two millenia.

Whether or not this was the case at the beginning (and there are countless good arguments to be made that it was never the case), Christianity has been the religion of the largest and most impressive conquerors the world has ever known. The European Christian Empires were beyond anything humanity had ever known from a military perspective. We have doctrines like Just War, we have the Crusades, and we also have a ton of Biblical evidence and arguments which I shall not bother going into because quite frankly it is idiotic to consider Christianity and Christians as a bunch of weak, meek and submissive people. Historically they were anything but, in the modern day they are characterised by jews, atheists, pagans and wiccans as cruel, violent, intolerant oppressors. Clearly your theory here is not true.

Completely untrue and actually quite disgusting to suggest. The period was only considered 'dark' because there was no unified Europe in what was the Roman Empire. It stopped being the 'Dark Ages' because Christianity 'united' the Continent.

Actually, considering we now have an extra hundred years on many of the people who wrote the text books you read as a child; it seems that technology and advancement did not align itself with ATHEISM, but with Protestantism. The Protestant work ethic and the unrestrained traveling and learning done by nations like Britain, the Netherlands, America and Germany saw a MASSIVE rise in innovation and technology. What we are now seeing is a rapid decline in innovation as well as overall intelligence as atheism, apathy and laziness embraces the West. As such I find it idiotic to believe that it was the irreligiosity of our recent ancestors that led to technological advancement; I find it far more likely that it was the work ethic of Protestantism combined with greater access to resources and sources of knowledge from around the world.

It's certainly happened, but its also a pretty nigger thing to say. Its pretty rare for it to happen, pagans have been venerated in Christianity, and a lot of pagan monuments live on either in their original forms or repurposed as Churches and Pigrimage sites around the Western world.

No it doesn't. Christian universities were places were HERESY was allowed and supposed to be actively explored and encouraged. If the academic world found something of value it would be brought into the 'mainstream'; it was far safer to have universities discuss heresies than allowing random peasants to indulge any and every idea they might have, as that leads to civil unrest and instability (which of course did happen several times). You might find that distasteful, be we live in a comparative land of plenty today; if your nation's survival relied on the peasants producing crops, then you would be very much opposed to them all embracing some suicide pact heresy and suddenly your whole nation starves to death over night.

The dark truth is that a Christian would say literally anything to convince someone to join the cult. I cannot trust you, because you actually believe that it is true on a supernatural level.

You are a conman and a fool. No matter if you speak truth, partial truth, or utter lies, it is all for one objective: To convert me.

And it's the same for you. They would say anything to keep you in the cult. And so here you are, ready to admit that you'd turn your back on atheists and pagans.

Anyone who values a Jewish spawned religion more than their own blood, more than their own family, is a traitor. And we don't need you.

With "you" being the other two groups that make up Aryans: Pagans and atheists.

Get out, traitor.

We did this argument already.

You lost.

Let me address it just in case though. Assuming you accept that religion is important for unity and survival, which we can argue about if you disagree, but for now I'll assume you'll accept that as its quite obvious; then it is in the best interests of our people to be united by a religion. Historically Christianity served very well for keeping our people strong and united, we have only seen our people's position weaken as Christianity lost first its prominence and respect in society, and now it is disappearing altogether and things are getting worse and worse.

You might argue that there could be a better religion than Christianity. You might be right, but first of all you would need to present a new religion, you would need to have some sort of reason for why it could be true, then we need to see if its actually a good idea, and then we would have to try and convince other people to follow it, all while trying to defend our current collapsing society. It seems to me that any attempt to do so would be difficult and likely counter-productive; it seems certain to me that, even if it was in the best interests of our race to change religions, now is not the time to do it. Now more than any other time we need to be united and we need to have an identity that is distinctly 'ours', which Christianity has and had provided so well for the last millenia.

Actually, atheists and pagans are traitors to their white brethren. Christianity remains the dominant religion of white people by a MASSIVE margin, and this becomes even more insanely huge when we factor in who is and is not breeding. The future generations of white people will disproportionately come from Christian families. Atheists breed in low to no numbers, and pagans are such a ridiculously small statistic as to not be worth talking about at the current time.

Those who would undermine a spiritual foundation that unites their race are the traitors. It is of note that there are parts of Scripture that speak to Nationalism, state that it is more important to take care of your own group, especially family, and that it is a sin to care for others over them. Still; in the grand scheme of things it is you who is undermining the interests of white by helping the jews to fracture one of the stabilising factors of any and all nations; faith.