No I fucking haven't, that was *my* point
Wow, great argument bro.
Yes I have via the example of China
You haven't though.
China is a backwards fucking country that is inconsistent and unable to do anything without fucking it up.
That's not an argument and the rest of this entry was just toothless warbling.
The point that we've been discussing is not addressed in any meaningful sense via your commentary here.
using, showing, or relating to
<a fucking dictionary definition
Good lord you are pedantic as fuck.
That's not a new system
It was when it was created, and meets the criterion you set forth.
the issues are its authoritarian model.
Wow, someone who doesn't like authoritarianism… Oh, but you say you like "Nazism". Seems legit bro.
No, National Socialism is about maintain the traditions of ones' people.
No, National Socialism is about maintain the traditions AND BIOLOGIC NATURE of one's people.
Yes, because politics is a main driver of factional infighting.
No, difference in perspective is a main driver thereof, as well as being a main driver of politics.
Factional infighting can only come if people have unlimited power and can organize efficiently.
it's preventing people from undermining the republic through malicious actions and subversion.
Still sounds pretty tyrannical from here bud.
These factions form because people with a magnitude of reasons. Sometimes it's based on power, others indifference with a regime, others simply thinking they're better, etc.
In all cases, the core point is that they have differences in perspective. And every ideological regime espouses this. Thus, there is only a spectrum of this transpiring, and in an authoritarian model, the capacity for this to expand is generally limited in scope.
Because we're not Jews, give an explanation for why it doesn't work.
That is still not an answer to the question, and it won't be, no matter how many times you say it, and I've already explained this to you in-depth. Like a jew, you ignore it and repeat yourself as though nothing has been said.
Nope, not everyone wants to subvert and undermine its neighbors
That's explicitly false, specifically and especially wherein it comes to regional competitors of a different race.
To deny this is to lie outright.
It's Jewish to undermine and subvert other nations to get a head start.
Its not Jewish because everyone does it and has done it since before the Jews existed.
No, its recognition that within a nationalistic bent, there are going to be conflicts amongst competitors.
If you went to war, it makes sense. Because there's a direct and clear hostile intention of the other.
And throughout history people who were not jews, and who didn't seek to engage in open warfare with their regional competitors, have done what you claim is explicitly and intrinsically jewish.
But Chinese intervention is enacting its will and people onto the host nation. They're just more public about it than Jews. How is it not the same?
I never said the Chinese were not like the jews in many ways, I said that everyone does what you are attempting to ascribe to the jews alone.
Because you cannot actually disprove them
No, rather, because you don't conceptually grasp what the meaning of words like 'prove' is, but behave as though you do, and thats frustrating.
No, what the Jews do is no different from what other nations want to do
Yes, it is.
China behaves very much like the jews in some regards, so thats a poor comparison; but most nations on earth now and throughout history have engaged in attempts to undermine their regional competition - especially of different racial clades - without resorting to open military force.
That's just a fact. The manner in which the Jews do so is intrinsically and specifically jewish - and the Chinese have, in some cases, undertaken similar methodologies, though usually less subversive in character than the jews themselves.
Nationalists are concerned about the well-being of their
That's why it's nationalism.
We aren't talking about subversion of countries necessarily, we are talking about undermining of countries.
Perfect, then my stance is even more appropriate.
Subversion is really the nasty thing about jews - but undermining of regional competitors, especially outside racial clade, via non-military means? People have been doing that as long as there have been people.