I don't have to do anything you dumb fucking monkey, it's all already happening.
With the technology of our times, the jess now have the ability to prop up economies, based on nothing, on literal thin air. It is becoming much harder for economic collapse and reset because of this type of instant electronic manipulation. Artificial inflation and market manipulation have kept the US economy afloat for the last 30 years, where it should have reset to zero, already. It will happen soon, though. Artificial scaffolding can only hold for so long until the tonnage of the inflated system finally tumbles. When it does, it will be glorious.
Kevin Cruz
You do know anons can see through your bs schlomo?
No. You point out the fallacies of their position. Personally, based on the vague definition of National Socialism that most people accept here, I am indeed a staunch National Socialist except for my annoying ability to question our Lord and Savior, Adolf Hitler. However, if some leftist faggot calls me a Gnat-see, the way I'd usually retort is In your opinion I'm a Nat-sea. You're only saying that because I'm White. "Nazi" is just a racial slur you spew at White people who question White Genocide. You say you are anti-Nazi. What you are is anti-White. That generally shuts them up by overloading their NPC-brains with positive information.
Yes, my point was that NO POLITICAL SYSTEM can survive that kind of pressure into perpetuity, AND that ANY AND ALL SYSTEMS will espouse what you've described as contributing to downfall as the consequence of people not being equivalents in vision.
China is still extant though. Probably as a direct consequence of their authoritarian policy positions inhibiting the capacity of this 'factional infighting' to cause too much havoc, unlike whats being seen in the US and other Western countries wherein such infighting has become foundational within the political system, leading inexorably towards demise.
I argue that, in fact, the authoritarian policy positions of many authoritarian states that still exist are primarily what is keeping them in extancy; however, acknowledging that no system of governance could stand up to a military assault of significant power (a strong kick on the door) combined with economic recession.
That's actually the opposite of the case of what I've observed, with authoritarian systems keeping such conditions from exploding out of control as is currently transpiring in the West.
This is an inevitability, merely representing a spectrum of propensity towards such outcomes.
Exactly.
Jaxon White
Churchill and the people before were still in on it. And no he didnt start a war and if were going to come to that logic, poland technically did by having replacing polduski's with a (((puppet))) and loading it up with propaganda and than provoking germany to war despite told many times not to harm the germans.
Carter Carter
He didn't though, and you've failed to demonstrate otherwise in any capacity whatsoever. I never said it did, I said that the European aka 'White' race was viewed as a racial category with ethnicities composing it. Which was the view of the National Socialists.
The idea that National Socialist Germany claimed or believed that each European ethnicity was its own 'race' is simply faulty, let alone that these ethnicities should demonstrate no solidarity or cohesion in optimal conditions, and I request you demonstrate otherwise with evidence as opposed to mere claim.
I remember seeing, quite recently, a wonderful graphic demonstrating the National Socialist view with regards to ethnicity in Europe. If someone happens to have it available, please post it.
Nathan Jones
>poland technically did by having replacing polduski's with a (((puppet))) and loading it up with propaganda and than provoking germany to war despite told many times not to harm the germans. Technically, the UK and France did, by giving the poles the belief they could do it and have support against any incursion against them. I don't blame the poles nearly as much as the Allies, on the same basis I don't blame the Russians as much as the Jewish Bolsheviks for what transpired in that instance.
Charles Williams
Pilsudski died in office. He was succeeded by some military guy. If that's being a "puppet" then Hitler was a puppet for taking over after Hindenburg died.
Stop talking out of your ass. That makes no sense at all. By that logic, Hitler started the war by taking power in Germany. Less emotional retorts. More logic please.
