Yeah, nature. Evolution (and thus the generation of races) is driven by generational adaptation to nature. Blue eyes are a perfect example. Terrible trait for most circumstances, hard to see in bright light, sun blindness, ect. Yet despite being a seemingly disadvantageous and recessive trait it was selected for because it helped our ancestors see better in low light situations (such as forests).
One things humans suck at is predicting the future. Nobody knows what traits will be necesssry for survival in 20 years. As a result if gene editing was available en mass today people would pick traits that society deems important. Yet if society collapsed tomorrow those traits may become massively disadvantageous. Height is another such example. There was once a minor subrace or very tall humans, giants more or less that went extinct. The earths climate moves in cycles and the Sahara was once jungle. These people probably had an advantage in this environment, in which they could physically dominate their opponents. But once the jungles got dry and hot they died out because they could not thermoregulate as well as shorter humans.
Moral of the story is don’t fear gene editing. Stay natural. We are the product of 1000s of years of struggle against the most powerful force on earth, nature. Human minds, however, are infallible.
Parker Rodriguez
Still the greatest insult imo, brits are top lads
Easton Williams
Honestly, is there a difference? The end result is the same: an empty husk of a nation filled with subhuman refuse and environmental detritus. It's even worse if perpetrated by your fellow countrymen.
Personally, I think chink greed will overcome their defensive instincts. Their leaderships cares fuckall for the rest of the drone hive, and will sell them out the moment the kikes come knocking with shekels in hand. But we'll see, time will tell…
I'm more wary of their land grabs in the East. If the States goes tits-up in Civil War 2.0, and various proxy conflicts break out in Europe (sponsored by our Religion of Peace TM friends in the Middle East), then China's free to gobble up large assets all over Africa. And that's the endgame - barring asteroid farming or other extra-terrestrial resource acquisition, the West is fucked. We don't have time to decouple technologically from the rest of the world (busy as we are wrangling the blood-sucking jew on our backs), and we can't march into Africa and cleanse it for resources because, even at the best of times, our populations are too cucked (courtesy of 70+ years of 'allied' brainwashing).
We're hurting for both resources and black swan events to gain an edge over the 6 billion subhumans armed with our tech.
Dark times ahead.
Levi Thompson
No.
Ethan Torres
IMO, the kikes are definitely our own most immediate threat to deal with, but I believe the Chinese are worse. The kikes still have to be somewhat minimally subtle & pretend like they actually give a shit. The Chinks have no subtlety nor fucks to give. Traitors first for sure. Overall they seem to be aggressively pursuing a global foothold similar in scope to that of the US. Their military is technologically sound but has one of the worst overall track records of any nation in history, which may or may not be being tempered by Russian experience (but then again the Russians could very well be banking on their strategic spaghetti spilling to eventually overcome them once the two together have won out). True dat. At least the global jihad eventually being waged with the crown & power of the former British empire will be amusing, in that "I laugh at that Shad comic of the dad paralyzing his daughter to be a fuck toy" sense.
Luke Powell
I repeated back the same thing to you about lurking more and you suggest that I am butthurt. You also suggest that I am a Jew because I said that Jews don't have any power in China. LOL. You are a low IQ newfag
You can have that for the ordinary citizen, but only if it's protected by mentally conditioned genetic supermen from outside enemies. Archaeofuturism is the way forward.
