Evola was an Accelerationist

faggot

bitch

This is not a matter of objective or subjective reality, this is a matter of communication. You can very easily come up with something like the Euler identity in your own mind using your own definitions, but in order to communicate what the things inside your mind even mean you need to have common meanings. In languages you have a much easier time to fill the gaps on your own and thus, if you miss one definition, you can easily compensate for it. In mathematics that is much more difficult because each definition is used to build up every definition that is above it so if you fuck up a definition early on then that problem cascades into whatever abomination you end up creating. For example, all groups have inverse and identity elements as part of the necessary requirements for them to be defined as a group. In multiplication the inverse is simply division (since if you multiply by one number and then divide by it then you have the same number you started with) and the neutral element is simply multiplying with one (since you get the exact same number back), but let's say your definition of multiplication has five different neutral elements (1,2,3,4,5) and the inverse is simply multiplying by seven. Do you think that me using those as definitions would make it easier or harder for us to understand each other? Are we even talking in the same language then?

You are asserting that zero is uncountable and unmeasurable. And thus if you assert that as the definition of finiteness then you are correct. However, if you consider finiteness to be the reverse of infinity then both zero and the non-real complex plane are counted within it. In this case it is really a topic mathematicians have given up on discussing a long time ago. Zero and infinity in of themselves are simply practical concepts, they do not exist in nature. Zero has no multiplicative inverse and thus any division by zero is undefined, since there is no number you can divide zero with that would equal one.
The sum of positive infinity and negative infinity is undefined due to the fact that you can have some infinities larger than other infinities, yet tending to infinity. As a result you can only declare sums to be equal zero if they are identical infinities (which is to be shown in this case). I know calculus may seem difficult but this is a concept you need to wrap your head around. You can think of it as adding two functions that diverge: if they are identical then you can subtract every single term to give zero, but if they are not identical then it will still have a limit at infinity even if you subtract both functions from one another.

Attached: Deaf.webm (856x480, 1.5M)

Also I am well aware that saying that you need identical infinities is too restrictive, but for the sake of simplicity I will simply assert identical infinities instead of saying infinities of the same size.

Here's a version without that furfag shit, since it's a pretty nice cover.

Attached: unfurfagged fasch daddy.jpg (750x1000, 157.4K)

This is not my arena so I will leave this alone. But you are trying to square the circle. It cannot be done.

He also was a cosmopolitan faggot that had never done anything other than write a book.

He should have been more like you

Usually people explain themselves when speaking about others in such a fashion

All you've ever accomplished was to be a low level government contractor who shills with demoralization tactics.

Deep in your heart do you still see that fire or do you just see ash? Do you still have wonder in your mind and the thirst to taste freedom? Or are you thoughtless and can only feel the weight of the manacles bout your wrists remaining you that you sold your life to slavers and thieves?

Faggot.

I assume you have some major accomplishments.