(((Rosenberg)))
Continuing where Alfred Rosenberg left off - new POL christianity
Eli Gonzalez
Samuel Long
i think its hilarious that almost all of your bible quotes your picture mentions come from matthew or Luke. You perfectly illustrate the difference between POL christianity and jewish christianity. all the bad stuff comes from matthew and luke.
You should look into this more and see if you dont change your mind.
Christianity is not bad if you take out matthew and luke.
this is what jews and subverted christians want you to believe. there is so little info about the early days of christianity because it was a huge anti-jewish movement, and so it was hushed up by the later subverted church.
the differences between these gospels are not random but is evidence of early church controversy centered on being anti-jewish.
i mean, do you expect the jews not to fight back and try to subvert christianity?
you need to think about these things before you believe all that mainstream history
in POL christianity, The epistle of James and all the other books are secondary to Mark and John's gospels. The epistle of James is hardly agreed upon, nor is it certain that James the disciple wrote it.
Martin Luther denigrated the epistle of james by calling it the epistle of straw, and highly critisiced it: catholicism.org
This is just one mainstream example of it being a secondary source.
But even if you like the epistle of james. that first sentence I'm not surprised he's evangelizing to jews; so he reference things they're familiar with.
A big point of POL christianity, is that jews are a race of demons that are the most in need of God's help. Is it surprising James is addressing them and the other 11 tribes of their extended family
William Rivera
Sadly, I have not seen any resources on this type of christianity. It seems the jews have successfully silenced anybody that would seek to unsubvert christianity; and i doubt they would let anybody get too popular who had these kinds of ideas.
The best you can do is study the differences between the two real gospels and the subverted gospels. re-wire your brain for POL christianity. As i've continued exloring this, I am constantly making revelations about christianity that explain away a lot of the reasons why people leave christianity to begin with. Ask me any questions about my own study of POL christianity, I can be your resource for as long as this thread lasts.
If there is one major point I want you to take away from this. it's that Jesus is God himself, and all the subverted christians like to confuse this simple point with a lot of weird theology designed to distract you from the simple point that Jesus is HE.
The son of God stuff comes from Jesus doctrine of raising us to be part of his devine nature. John 17:11: "Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are."
That God comes to tell us that we can be ONE with him, is complicated christology thhat explains what Jesus meant when he said that he was the son of God. God can do whatever he wants, it doesn't make Jesus any less God that he said these things; but rather just something to discover as we make our way closer and closer to communion with our Lord.
Glad to have you on board user. I wholeheartedly agree with you.
It would be the dream of my life to be a pastor "for us", and to walk side by side with our awakened volk and give them confidence as they throw off the shackles of subverted christianity without all of them having to become experts in theology.
A Christian revival against jewish subversion in my opinion will save the religion while at the same time eliminating all the conflicts with paganism, so that christians and pagans and Germanics could all get along in an alliance.
Jewish christianity has D&C'd us for far too long.
yeah. Maybe "Original Christianity" to emphasize that it's not a new religion but simply going back to the original before it was subverted
Luis Rogers
OY VEI ANTI SEMIT!
Blake Morales
Remove the old testament too. Then you've got something great.
Owen Perry
Ephesians 5:8
"For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord: walk as children of light:"
Children of light must walk the Path Of Light.
A lot of what you're suggesting really does just seem like the ancient/medieval readings of Scripture. Jews just recontextualized everything and literally changed the Bible, which incidentally was one of the major reasons Jesus was necessary. They perverted the will of God for their own benefit.
Just listen to what Jesus said:
Also interesting to note that jews weren't actually an ethnic group until after 200ad. They proselytized constantly but were chased out by Christians. Their diaspora is a result of them finding converts and is also why their DNA can only be measured in relation to other jews.
mondediplo.com
It's also important to note that whites used to own much more territory. Scythians were central Asian whites. Syrians still have a white minority like Assad and pic related.
Jaxson James
If you also remove the gospel of Mark, and use the gospel of John as your sole witness, then yes you could remove every book from the old testament.
It's the gospel of Mark where Jesus says Isaiah prophesied well of the hypocrits.
If you continue down this route, the end result is a type of Christianity that writes off all jews as actual demons who were vanquished by Jesus doctrine which led to the romans genocyding them; so that all the jews today aren't real jews but just evidence that anyone who calls himself a jew is possessed by a demon.
If Jew is synonymous with Devil, then jewish would mean Devilish.
Including Mark, implies including the book of Isaiah. Which only changes things by saying that God uses the evil of the jews as his own personal weapon against his enemies. Like God created evil for his own pleasure to punish sinners with. In this way Jews can sometimes be good, even though they are by nature evil.
So maybe you would fall into the John only crowd. That's the only way you can remove the old testament and still be christian.
Sebastian Scott
No. Fuck off. We don't need a "better" kikestianity. We need kikestianity gone entirely. There is nothing good about kikestianity. There is nothing beneficial about kikestianity.
IT WAS JEWED FROM THE START. IT WAS LITERALLY FOUNDED AROUND AND FOCUSED ON WORSHIPPING A KIKE RABBI. IT IS A KIKE RELIGION. KILL YOURSELF.
Ryan Adams
No. It wasn't.
Logan Cooper
As expected. Tell me how a kike rabbit making a kike splinter group of a kike religion worshipping a kike god in any way whatsoever is NOT kiked. Explain your reasoning.