The defenders of race as a social construct lacked a certain savoir-faire, but behind their uncharisma was a truth rooted in what used to be known as three generation conservatism. Epigenetics fades.
As for the “speech is violence” people, responding to them with violence is imbecilic. I detested them because people who have poor speech/violence boundaries are not pacifists. Being just like them is broken shit. Defy abuse, don’t emulate it.
What's most amusing is that those who say this will often engage in anti-White speech themselves. Or to be more accurate, anti-White violence.
Judgemental words are considered violent. This is a complicated topic for this board, but consider how you can ask for the same thing two different ways and get two very different responses based on how you ask.
Also: Live by the sword, die by the sword.
I learned pacifism by having actual violence dealt to me (and by dealing some back), but my response is rare as hen’s teeth. Most people when treated violently learn violence, not pacifism, especially if they participate. In my case I hated winning fights like I hated losing fights - I hated fights, period. I hated fights deep down in darkness even when it didn’t seem safe to speak of it. Who I was in darkness eventually started coming out in the open - relatedly, I live in peace today.
Generally people are more… adaptive on the matter than I was. They’re less automatically opinionated on the matter than I was. They adapt to whatever the conditions of life are. They reciprocate incoming patterns. They learn to find joy in whatever contests are set before them. They’re more peaceful if treated peacefully and more violent if treated violently. That’s what people are like AFAIK.
If you teach people violence by dealing violence to them, you’ll probably die violently.
I like gun rights because guns protect pacifism by increasing the hazards of conflict. Instead of learning violence, it stops being something quite so repeatable and survivable. If you try violence to a gun owner, you likely just die.
pathetic.
You'll die peacefully of starvation when a violent people comes demanding your resources.
Oh, hey. We disagree, but you seem different from most users of this site. For wading into the pit here with something potentially wise, thank you.
Think about how much death came from these two words: "God"+"Allah". Now think about how many billions of lives were annihilated, how much of this planet was irredeemably destroyed by the term "jew".
If it comes to that, I’ll arm up and shoot them. I have always defended myself. The only thing pathetic is being so primitive you undermine civilization by violently taking resources. People like me starve least in nightmares like that, because I would work to help people, and be helped. You would submit yourself to violence, and die on your knees.
Believe means control over others. Divine is the roadblock to understand this. Nature demands adaptation, which means knowledge. Believe demands resignation, which means ignorance.
Not pacifism
ROME literally CREATED civilization through violence.
The USA was CREATED through violence.
Continue eating cock.
rome stopped existing because they stopped being intelligent war lords who ruled and became welfare queens who demanded they not have to fight to survive. USA is going down that same path.
You're a retard and a pussy and your beliefs are not only killing yourself but destroying the civilization you claim you want to preserve.