Would you kill Alan Turning ?

This is a really naive way of thinking. Pointing to the extreme exception of someone who has a certain trait, doesn't mean we can't act against that trait. The removal of degeneracy from society far outweighs the benefits one Turing can provide. In a fact being in a well-traditioned society, men of genius are more likely to be led into positions in which they can change the world than in a disordered society.

Faggots typically don't reproduce, so as long as they don't act effeminate and set a bad example to normal males, they can hang around and make themselves useful.
The context also matters. Roman non-military citizens caught taking it in the ass would certainly not be respected or seen as manly, but afaik wouldn't be killed.
On the other hand, legionaries caught in the act would be stoned to death by other soldiers.

Yes, it would help the nazis win.

This is the thing. Nobody went after Turing until he started pushing his gay dramas in to the public eye.
Then they gave him drugs to help him concentrate more on computers than mens bottoms. Sadly not thinking about mens bottoms caused him to kill himself. But the intention was to help him and stop him being a drama queen.

you dont seem to understand its not hatred its disappointment and shame paired with grief about losing brothers and sisters to not making offspring

Nigger the world's first real computer was made by a German under Nazi germany
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z3_(computer)
And even if Alan was a disgusting fag he was still a white man, so being a fag won't change the fact that he had the intellectual capabilities to contribute to Science

Hating individual faggots is largely a waste of time. We have to hate what produces faggots in the first place, and that is ZOG-culture and capitalism.
The faggot-identity has become an existential linchpin of "America." People only understand what a faggot is, and how to be a faggot, because Hollywood constructed the faggot-identity in the first place. This is something even admitted by faggots who are self-conscious of it; see the excellent article The Myth of the Fag Hag and Dirty Secrets of the Gay Male Subculture by Rohin Guha.
Christfags that run conversion therapy outfits aren't interested in curing faggots. They're only interested in parting money from fools at best, or at worst, turning faggots into faggots for Jesus (like the Christian woman).
Revolutionary White Nationalism will stomp out the faggot identity permanently, because it is already possible to determine which male children will grow up to become faggots early on. They will be identified by the school system, and singled out for psychological experimentation.
I myself think it is pretty self-evident that homosexuality is a form of early-onset autogynephilia. The prepubsecent male child hasn't begun to sexually festishize women the way post-pubescent boys do, and so instead comes up with an child's fantasy of what they think makes women horny. This is sexual object is a hyper-masculine male, and so to imagine the feminine state of sexual arousal, they conjure up an image of the hyper-masculine male, which then becomes their own erotic fantasy object. This is a psychological process that can be disrupted in the young male, but it has to be done early on if there is any real chance of success here.
If that fails, revolutionary White Nationalists will simply force would-be faggots to get their dicks chopped off and turned into women early on. There aren't going to be faggots after we destroy that thing called "America," one way or another.

Gays are fine so long as they support agenda of curing gayness. Also so log as they arent pedo degens. So almost none of them.

I'd rather live in 1800 England with no computers but also no niggers and faggets then in modern England with computers and rape gangs and rampant faggotry

Devil's advocate.
Homosexual acts are the purview of Kompromat- before progressing to more iniquity, faggotry is first in line.