My teacher is quite open-minded, he identifies as a centrist though he's left leaning. I've been able to talk about gun rights and lower taxes, especially when we were studying Locke and some libertarian philosophers.
That's exactly what I do often. I don't openly explain my views, just a lighter description of them. I've used devil's advocate to explain the sexual marketplace theory. There's a communist in my class who probably lurks leftypol from what I've gathered, so he probably has an idea of what I'm up to.
Luke Hill
ah, then beyond that I guess I'm probably a little lost as well. A friend of mine (also rather redpilled) has taken up a habit of, when meeting certain types of leftwingers, trying to get them to at least agree on one or a couple topics, usually things like the media is terrible and dishonest.
I'm not sure how much effect it has on these people in general, but it is a talking point that alot of people seem to agree on, and frankly if we could get alot of people in the left to stop following the (((media))) I think we'd have come a long way towards solving some issues.
Parker Phillips
The thread 404'd What was on it?
Carter Nguyen
To be honest, I do the same. I get people to think I'm on their side when I'm about to drop redpills, but then I start mentioning things or asking questions so they don't become (as) hostile by thinking "he's right wing, that's right wing propaganda". Leftists tend to hate rich people, so that's a good opportunity to say things about Jews. Have you got any good redpill graphics I could rip stats or facts from?
Ryan Nelson
It is challenging and in the end, only the ones that seek the truth find it.
Caleb Cruz
Some of the best fascists and nat-soc people used to be commies, at least doctrinal ones who actually did their homework. I was quite left-leaning before I became Zig Forums tier so I know how to reason with such people. Putting wealth as the central tenet of life is exactly what leads to "worker exploitation" and most commies are just failed capitalists who flip sides as soon as they acquire some wealth and political power. In fact, kikes create an economical environment where there is only an illusion of economic freedom (while they control everything and rig the game entirely), so people are actually never given an opportunity to have financial independence and become wealthy, which in turn leads them to reject the idea entirely and look for the state tit as the only solution, which only deepens the problem. The key is to give people an actual opportunity to become entrepreneurs, acquire capital etc.
Globohomo neoliberals are much worse because their beliefs are not consistent and are entirely based on social manipulation and pilpuls. Basically, denial of reality to the point of absurdism. SJW's , antifas, are just the lowly thug enforcers of the global (((finance))) and when arguing with them, you are not arguing with actual people who hold political beliefs, you are arguing with Jewish think-tanks, glownigger "influencers" and pseudo-religious zealots brainwashed by them (or paid by them to spread propaganda). Those people are completely incapable of arguing outside their scripted training which makes them an easy target for well educated independent thinkers.
Levi Watson
Someone convince me redpilling isn't useless. How long have we been doing this? How many decades of pamphlet work do nazis (translated mein kampf for pow), American nazis (rockwell's activism), stormfags, anons, altright, etc.(memes and infographs) need to do? How many more decades? Are we expecting everyone to eventually be redpilled, and then we'll all make the change without resistance? Half of everyone, so we can vote our way to victory? Perhaps enough to forcibly take control of the bluepilled majority? What if we're not fighting ideas? What if we're fighting biological populations with unchangeable survival strategies which express themselves as anti-civilization aka leftist voting blocs? Are we really trying to educate, inform, debate and negotiate with crazies, retards, parasites and eternal enemies?
Adam Parker
Pushing you agenda on others, sounds jewish
Parker King
I think the purpose of redpilling is just to cause chaos. If you've got lots of people walking around spouting crime statistics, it'll eventually reach the point where major groups have to openly acknowledge this and make a statement denying it. If they have holes in their argument, someone will point it out and more will become "redpilled". It's either done by people who genuinely believe in Zig Forums rhetoric, or those who want to poke holes in the left wing for different reasons; like myself. It's a one-man social experiment.
Colton Baker
It's not pushing an agenda, it's introducing new ideas into the marketplace, with solid-sounding evidence to back it up. It'll make leftists start arguing with each other and acknowledge things that they vehemently reject, in order to reject them at all. That'll plant the idea. Since some aren't too intelligent, they might end up believing all of it if you mix in a bit of hate towards rich people/the government. Ultimately, it undermines the left's influence. honk honk
