whatever shlomo
How to effectively redpill people
Samuel Cooper
Austin Wilson
Redpilling is literally essential. People are slowly waking up, its working.
Historically speaking, this dystopia we live in is an anomaly. Historically, humanity has overwhelmingly agreed with us on most points. By no means do I mean that everyone has been national socialists, but most have agreed with traditional values.
The progressive experiment has been proven a failure. People are more miserable than ever. The people will begin to become redpilled on their own, it is our job, with our knowledge, to ensure they grow wise.
Or of course you could go full retard and just go shoot up some brown people and prove the media completely right.
Nathan Scott
...
Brandon Phillips
Finish school and hide your power level. Loosing future over being banned by kiked headmasters is stupid
Anthony Flores
The easiest way to convince someone of anything is to massage their ego.
If you want to convince someone what they just said is wrong, start out your sentence with the words 'you're right'. I promise you this really helps.
Changing peoples beliefs is uncomfortable for everyone. If you can convince them that they believed the same as you all along that is far less painful to peoples egos.
Ayden Scott
Playing devils advocate works for me.
I'm trying to befriend people by finding some common interests, after which I'll become an over-the-top radical. Most people, except conservatives, are quite openminded when it comes to different viewpoints.
When talking to leftwingers, after smoking some pot with them, I'd play the role of an over-the-top nazi, blaming everything on the jews, praising the greatest fuhrer of all times, and making the most offensive jokes imaginable. Normally they're agreeable people, just waiting for someone to take the lead. When they feel it's okay, they'll start venting their frustrations with their own ideology. Usually they're quite disappointed by the minorities, whose rights they want to defend, if they ever came into contact with said minorities. Those leftists I've met don't feel to be in the right anymore. They're quite tolerant to libertarian viewpoints, if you reassert, that you're not some kind of totalitarian shithead, but someone, who argues from a point of individual freedom and individual responsibility, which wants to empower individuals.
Mainstream-Conservatives are harder. Personally, I consider them fools, unable to think outside the borders and authority and cultural taboos. If they're not pissed off by the status quo, they can't be reached. If they're pissed off, I try to radicalize them further by stating, that they should convert to islam, because islam fights for the same things, they're lacking: For a space, where one can live according to ones own standards, even if those are conflicting with mainstream society. I'm always trying, to convince them, to erect their own NoGo-Zones, where they could live among themselves.
but usually it's a waste of time to talk to conservatives. At least in my opinion. They're much too cucked, so that even if they radicalize, they'd be too timid to do anything. But it's always a good feeling to see those cucks suffer, which is why I OFTEN remind them, that their grandchildren will suck muslim dick and like it, because women don't respect men which are too cowardly to defy unjust authority. Again - I try to radicalize them, not befriend them. They can be radicalized by pointing out, that their way of thinking fails, and that this makes them deserving of losing everything they value.
What's left… Libertarians usually join the cause as soon as someone points out, that mass migration leads away from any form of a libertarian society, and that's their best chance to join the cause of the radical right. A society capable of libertarianism is a byproduct of ethnocentrism. They can still work towards a libertarian society from within the radical right, and they're working actively against any libertarian outcome, if they don't join.
Libertarians also can be convinced by the fast, that, according to game theory, ethnocentrism is the optimal strategy of "collectivizing". Libertarians are aware of the need of things like community, which would break down, if everyone would be living by the tit-for-tat-strategy. A stable community is only achievable by ethnocentrism. According to game theory.
Another more broadly applicable thing is, that most people enjoy social circles, that regularily ignore societal conventions. If everything within those circles is far outside of the norm, thoughts get freed from societal constraints. Many people want to be part of such an circle.
Adrian Martin
cum on, you lazy niggers. This is not an unimportant topic.
Gabriel Hall
I don't know about "effectively", but I would attack the Big Lies that people might already have questions about.
Transgender is bullshit and obvious bullshit that the schools are forcing on you because they were ordered to by a corrupt government and corrupt gay movement beholden to Big Pharma.
medium.com
Muslim groups have laid out their plans for conquering the US and Europe but the police have not rolled them up, yet they're going after anyone who talks about it.
muslim-library.com
thehill.com
extras.wnd.com
centerforsecuritypolicy.org
The Yemen war is all about control of a strategic shipping lane. China and Iran are trying to take it over. The media is not telling you this. The media only shows people bitching about arms sales to Saudi Arabia.
moroccoworldnews.com
The Palestinian narrative was completely fabricated within the past 30 years. It is just another Muslim jihad with tribalism mixed in, and it is another example of the media lying. Most of (((The Jews))) who are fucking everything up today came out of a British consensus cracking operation to promote the Palestinians and target Israel's supporters. And if you dig deep enough, it really is the Rothschilds at the center of it all.
david-collier.com
web.archive.org
frontpagemag.com
The media's beloved Jamal Khashoggi was a spy who supported Bin Laden.
clarionproject.org
frontpagemag.com
Bentley Bailey
what future do we have?
Jack Butler
ehh, you'll have to elaborate on what you mean by 'bullshit'. It's a mental disorder outlined in the DSM, and since rationality still has a small part at the table, it's a great forefront for debates since it creates so much cognitive dissonance.
these two outlooks are commonly held in tandem by the left. press the issue, and they'll either begin to concede the argument in little ways or they'll become more hysteric, hurting their public image.