The EU election in my country gave me a crisis of faith Zig Forums

Richard Spencer was mentored by a Jew and glows in the dark.
He was signal boosted by mainstream media just like other aut kike figures back during 2015 - 2017.

We need another Hitler or equivalent, and before then we probably need a major crisis.
Supporting controlled opposition figures poisons this movement.
But it seems like the time for National Socialism has come again, with the internet acting like the modern version of radio during the 1920s and 1930s, and mass disillusion with society similar to what happened during that era.

If the economy collapses, the US goes to war with Iran, or something else happens to further destabilize society, it will be a massive opportunity.
Right now it's 1919 - 1920.

Nationalism is growing. Nationalism in America probably can not be saved peacefully. In Europe, however there is a chance for Nationalism. We can still stamp parties out of the ground and make them grow. Many of these parties will be controlled opposition, but dont forget that they are doing work for us. Some of the parties have just started growing and its our task to make them grow and to stay aware of psyops.
Violence doesnt work when the masses wont agree with it. I think most partys in Europe that advocate for leaving the EU are controlled opposition. Leaving the EU is a bad thing to happen for Natsocs because we will be targeted by lefties and ALL governmental parties. They are funded and are controlled by globalists.

For me its obvious that the Brexit campaign what is already taking a ton of years is just a psyop to make people think that leaving the EU is a legit option. We NEED the EU to be able to grow as a NatSoc party, otherwise the resistance to grow will be way to huge.

So what? Is every interaction with a jew bad?
And glow in the dark is not an argument.

Untill he wasn't. And he wanted their attention and got it.

He isn't controlled opposition though. How do you know? Farage is. Tommy Robinson is. All the populist parties that slow the process of replacement, legimitize it.

Same reason they weren't by all indications in 1928. Again, what is "young" in this context again?

Yeah, you're fucking stupid by the sound of it my man. That's retarded.

Pic related bud.

Exactly. How'd it get that way? And who did that?
And what do you think 40% non-german births is going to do if maintained for any length of time? And who did THAT?
See where I'm going with this?

Oh, well then… Let them? That would be a good thing, no?

Feminists are retarded. Women are retarded. That's why Hitler banned them from many political positions, remember?

Yes, that's exactly what it is. Women are retarded. And when they get too much power, retarded things happen. And the consequences of that… Well, remember the

Forgot my pic last time.

Look bud, in the offhand chance you're not some kind of faggot-ass shill, let me paint you a picture.
Imagine every female you know - family, friends, lovers, all of them - is a prostitute. Not because she wants to, but because its necessary to survive. Imagine every man you know is living a life of defeated desperation, a decade after your nation was defeated in a terrible and brutal war that left your streets clogged with mangled half-men, shadows of once noble beings crippled by hardship.
I want you to imagine standing on the street in the snow, shivering, with an empty belly, outside a fancy hotel, watching rich jews from around the world come to your homeland to experience carnal delights that even the Levantines would turn up their noses at.
Welcome to 1928.

What one man can do, another can do. This is your struggle. The new nation isn't just going to come down out of the clouds, ya know?

I've seen this, but, I haven't seen it approximating anything like what you're suggesting.

Looks like you got your work cut out for you then, don't it?
You think your situation is bad?
Listen here cousin - because you are my cousin, far removed perhaps - I want you to now imagine you live in a once-great land, founded as a White ethnostate… That slowly wasted away… Soon, you weren't even 50% of the country, but you had half the world's jews living comfortably in your lands. Your nation is a laughing stock. Your people are dying in droves to filthy drugs peddled by billionaire kikes. In addition to the far-flung mongrels which breach your shores - the same sort you're seeing today - you also have freakish negroids living in inbred ghettos in every city - most have been completely overtaken, were so before you were born - and hyper-violent savage-stock, streaming in by the tens and hundreds of thousands each year… Welcome to to my life in 2018.
Things can get a lot worse my man. And they're going to have to before things get better.

You weren't, and I have NO IDEA why you would think that.
I don't think that's true either - and I don't believe you could possibly have come to that conclusion, thus, I further suspect this is LARP… But I'll engage for the sake of it potentially not being, and for the audience of course.

Attached: 0.jpg (480x360, 14.69K)

Yes, yes, 'very complex', that is what he kept saying… But is it really? So much more 'complex' than islam? I don't think so. I think its more blatant, we've just been more heavily conditioned against seeing it… And why is that? Because its the real (((enemy))). Islam is just a sword. Without the jews, Islam is nothing but inbred savages at our mercy. But WITH the jews, well… All that changes. And zionist are well aware of that and some of the worst offenders, because it serves them to present themselves as mild and humble and weak (while in reality being the most 'insidiious' and pervasive threat) while showing the muslims as hazard (while in reality being nothing but a consequence of jewish influence upon us).

You're right, I was paraphrasing. What he DID say was "jews aren't taking our women and putting them in hijabs or whatever" and he's right - jews are taking our women and putting them in pornographic films.
He went on to say "I don't think Zionism is inherently an enemy in that sense", referring to control over media and "how we dream" (whatever the fuck that means…), and that's an absolutely nonsensical statement in-context given the various connections of that sort between media and zionism.

I disagree, I would suggest the conflict with the jews is the TRUE civilizational clash, the islamic component is merely that - a component. The conflict with islam isn't even so much 'civilizational' so much as 'philosophical' and the brutal truth is, in many regards, islam has a better handle on its philosophy than does Western Europe under judaic subversion.
Declaring war on ISIS IS declaring war on jews, that's just the rub of it. Granted, nobody says so openly… But why not? I think this acceptance of the status quo on discussion is a falsehood, and the Overton window is much wider than the standard narrative I hear suggests.

I disagree with that in-entirety, particularly in the context of the israeli zionists.

He definitely is, whether or not you agree with that narrative is the question.
Its a discussion, wherein a given party is being querried and presenting their narrative positions on various topics - in this case, a man who claims his 'mentor' was a zionist jewish man (Paul Gottfried) and who is now saying that "zionism is not an enemy in the context of controlling media narratives", claiming "the jewish question is just so complex" and promoting the narrative of the holohoax (whether for optics or not, pretty irrelevant).

I do though.
He should.
No, no, no. "Conservatives" don't deny that history at all, they embrace it and cuck on it. Nationalists, however, point out that much of the 'history' presented IS IN FACT A LIE. And those lies form the narrative foundation which acts to inhibit such activies as explicit White advocacy. As such, they MUST BE CONFRONTED (as opposed to 'embraced' or 'owned') because to internalize these narratives is to legitimize and solidify EVEN FURTHER the foundations which act to inhibit what is necessary to serve a truly Nationalistic stance.

Yes, its very cucky. Its EXTREMELY cucky, and almost-certainly for optics - which basically everyone with half a brain sees through immediately. If its NOT for optics, also a possibility and a strong point of suspicion because of his stance on zionism and associations therewith, then he's trying to poison his own people with a weak cucky narrative which will only act to inhibit.
Taking ownership of a false history which is inherently designed and aimed to discredit your very perpetuation as a biologic and cultural clade, consciously and purposefully internalizing such a thing, is the paramount of dysgenic behaviors.

In a mentorship capacity? Yes.
Jews are wretched creatures and are the (((great enemy))) of our kin, and the primary source above all others of our current woes. Thus, mentorship beneath such a creature, is certainly a terrible omen.

And they used him, he didn't use them; then he killed his own branding by foolishly associating with questionable characters and then turning on them and the audiences they had generated. Now… I haven't heard anything meaningful out of him in quite some time, probably since that livestream where IT SURE FUCKING SEEMED he had a Black woman in his apartment during a livestream.

He certainly appears so.
I've described as much in detail, but you can't really KNOW with certainty in this scenarios, so asking that and then going to what you say next seems somewhat ridiculous.
Yes, he is.
Yes, he is.

Does that in any way inhibit Spencer from also being such? No, not at all.

I'd agree with that sentiment to at least some extent, namely in regards to the suggetion that it ought not be slowed, but halted entirely.

No, I understand perfectly. However, you might be misunderstanding where I'm coming from. The issue that you're raising is fair. Hardcore leftists do not care about hypocrisy but a lot of their base is not that way. The liars and legitimately evil opportunists are in charge, they don't represent everybody though. I'm glad no one wrote me off when I was a leftist. They essentially program "trigger phrases" to shut down a norm's reasoning centers. Getting past that is only half the battle.

I think you're being both too optimistic and too pessimistic. It doesn't make sense to group all of them together, instead the whole idea is to create fracture points in every plank in the mainstream platform to weed out the sincere people from the NPCs.

Science worship is dumb because there isn't anything spiritually satisfying behind it. Empirical observation is great but that's a process, not a set of beliefs. It can be easily twisted, which is why they're like that in the first place. It took us 8 years to actually get a large amount of people to accept the racial gaps in IQ despite knowing about them for 100. Don't assume instant acceptance. Unfortunately, everything is based on what people believe, not the objective truth.

You're assuming you can just go out and preach the truth and everybody will go, "yeah, totally!" when all evidence points to the contrary. I've been doing this for a long time, it doesn't matter if you're right, it matters if people listen.

Same jew spam Zig Forums has been bitching about in the fucking meta.