Christianity, racial aliens

Is Christianity a potential vector for allowing racial aliens, the Jews(Israelites), within the midst of Europeans? Israel seems to be Central to the religion of Christianity and the religion seems to revolve around the Israelites.

Attached: 1935_Antisemitism_der_Welt_3.jpg (504x292, 32.48K)

Other urls found in this thread:

judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/12310/how-are-spartans-the-son-of-abraham
usccb.org/bible/1maccabees/12
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Is it possible that the Jews are the descendants of the Spartans?

Are you asking if ethnic Maccabean Judeans had a racial affinity with the Greek Spartans?

That's the stupidest post I've seen in a while. Yes, there are stupid questions.

He gets it from this:

Chapter 12 verse 20-23 of the Book of Maccabees I

"Arius, king of the Spartans, sends greetings to Onias, the chief priest. It has been found in a writing concerning the Spartans and Jews, that they are a kinsmen, and that they are descended from Abraham. Now since we have learned this, please write us about your welfare. We for our part write you that your cattle and property are ours and ours are yours. So we command them to report to you to this effect."

According to one reading of Josephus, Josephus makes the same claim:

"Areus, King of the Lacedemonians, to Onias, sendeth greeting … we have discovered that both the Jews and the Lacedemonians (Spartans) are of one stock, and are derived from the kindred of Abraham … This letter is four-square; and the seal is an eagle, with a dragon in his claws"(Ant.12:4:10)

judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/12310/how-are-spartans-the-son-of-abraham

Maybe not so stupid.

Is it possible op is a vector for shit threads?

user

usccb.org/bible/1maccabees/12

Christianity can be a vector allowing racial aliens but it can also be used in service of the race, it depends on whose interpreting the bible. Atheism has been been worse than christianity though, just look at sweden. If you get rid of christianity it should be replaced with something else, a racial religion. A racial religion might be better than christianity. I just wouldnt abandon christianity unless you promote an alternative to it.

No

Attached: Homo Neanderthalensis1.jpg (504x292 160.54 KB, 48.21K)

No, it's an actual vector and always has been.

They are and always have been kikes -in the intervening years some admixed with Spaniards, some with Slavs and some with Arabs/levantines'etc. but always kikes in the end. The "ACHKSHUALLY [insert group or individual] wasn't [bad Jew] and was in fact [good Jew]" is just Christian Identity horseshit that they use to talk themselves into believing that obeying a book where virtually every single character is a Jew of some description is in fact anti-semitic. Even their anti-semites are usually utterly retarded and/or most of the way to being kosher; just look at Stephen "my grandmother was Jewish" Anderson, who rails against Jews for not being Christians but sees absolutely no problem personally marrying a blonde woman to a nigger - or that WA state employee who got caught with a folder full of LARP that would embarrass a shitposter.

The roman empire got destroyed by christianity. The barbarians were let in because "you wouldn't turn your back on christian refugees, eh goy?"

christos=mashiah=inri=jwo=the end of the white race

You Dumbasses.

Hey, dumbasses. Political philosophy time.

Imagine a grand simple graph of society’s inclusiveness. Imagine that every single person on the planet had an inclusion height. Down at zero there’s this competent and resilient person who manages to be nondescript, clever, and harmless all at the same time. No sane society excludes that person. Up at infinity there’s an eldritch horror from beyond our dimensions of reality who no sane society includes. The rest of us are all between zero and infinity.

Where are you, between zero and infinity? Think not of how you’re known, but of who you truly are. Imagine someone just like you, but incapable of effectively concealing their true nature. Everyone has an obligation to protect that person. Protect the person who is just like you, but their nature can’t be concealed. In order to protect that person, make sure society is inclusive enough to tolerate them.

Do that, and society will always be tolerant enough to tolerate you.

And for the love of all conceivable loves, step back your true nature if your true nature is violent, because protecting the violent takes a ten ton terror. Rehabilitate that shit.

Racists aren’t inclusive enough to be included. That’s the problem. Racists are up near infinite required inclusiveness, but they DEMAND inclusiveness so low that they spend eternity irreparably tardraging at each other.

Everything is a potential vector. Christians need to read the bible so they understand that the lies pushed by the usurpers who control the corporations they falsely call churches are not Christian.
Jews are not Israelites. Jews are an assortment of Khazars and Samaritans that converted to talmudism, the satanic Babylonian religion of the pharisees that Jesus called the Synagogue of Satan, and sons of Satan, and a brood of vipers.

Yeah but what's NOT a vector for human interaction? Jobs, hobbies, going to bars, being on a cat fan facebook group. Fucking anonymous message boards.

Before the Babylonian captivity the jews were already what they are today, (((their))) books should this pretty well. I don't know how much European genetics (((they))) brought into the fold over the centuries but they act the same as back then.

Book of Ezra Chapter 4

11 This is the copy of the letter that they sent unto him, even unto Artaxerxes the king; Thy servants the men on this side the river, and at such a time.

12 Be it known unto the king, that the Jews which came up from thee to us are come unto Jerusalem, building the rebellious and the bad city, and have set up the walls thereof, and joined the foundations.

13 Be it known now unto the king, that, if this city be builded, and the walls set up again, then will they not pay toll, tribute, and custom, and so thou shalt endamage the revenue of the kings.

14 Now because we have maintenance from the king's palace, and it was not meet for us to see the king's dishonour, therefore have we sent and certified the king;

15 That search may be made in the book of the records of thy fathers: so shalt thou find in the book of the records, and know that this city is a rebellious city, and hurtful unto kings and provinces, and that they have moved sedition within the same of old time: for which cause was this city destroyed.

16 We certify the king that, if this city be builded again, and the walls thereof set up, by this means thou shalt have no portion on this side the river.

Jews did not exist then.
Those are not jews, they are Judeans. The Judeans were exterminated by Rome in 70 AD. Jews only started calling themselves jews in the 1700s to give themselves a false claim to Palestine. They have absolutely no connection to ancient Hebrews at all. They never even spoke Hebrew until the 1880s, they spoke Yiddish. And ancient Hebrews stopped speaking Hebrew centuries before their extermination. If kikes were actually Hebrews, they should be speaking Aramaic, not Hebrew. But they are not, they are Khazars who will say anything to get away with stealing.

it died because they moved the culture more towards jeruselam and further from actual europeans.

It always was. You have to consider the situation of late Rome, it was really like modern London or probably worse.
These near easterners are the ones who likely converted to christianity first and brought it into Europe in the first place. Ancient DNA is coming and rumors say that during the Imperial era, samples from near Rome(I think the harbor of Ostia, basically Paris metro I guess) formed a cluster stretching from south Italy to Syria/Levant. For this reason I disagree with and agree with , it's not like christianity destroyed Rome, Rome destroyed itself down to its racial element and as a natural consequence, the near east sandniggers of the city replaced paganism and its mos maiorum with a religion more familiar to them.
And once the Urbs itself was christianized and its elites converted, the carcinome was set.

Luckily then between plagues and the devastating gothic wars these sandniggers mostly died out in all likelihood(ancient cities unlike post-industrial revolution ones were essentially demographic sinks which would be devastated the hardest by plagues and war, it is reported that in ~500AD the population had dwindled to only ~30k inhabitants, compared to the 1M of ~1AD), but the damage was done, christianity had gained its prestige, which was enough to hypnotize germanics, who had the power to push this virus back but instead converted to it.
Even if at this point christianity was in the hands of actual Europeans, in largely forced to swallow it, its feeble historical racial conscience is visible to anyone.

hold on so is the fundamental elements of paganism within roman catholicism actually a good thing?
or did the good parts of paganism just make their christianity more pernicious?

1. Rule 4. Reported.
2. No.

I don't know about you but medieval Catholicism, you know, of Dante Alighieri, Barbarossa and the like, is the only kind of christianity I could sort of tolerate. So yeah, for me that's a no brainer, pagan influence is what attempted to Europeanize christianity. The "pagan" parts of Catholicism are also the backbone of its metaphysical/philosophical grounding, since Aristoteles first and later Plato and Plotinus were the major philosophers of antiquity from which Scholasticism was born and developed.

Sure.

Attached: religion-atheist.png (594x321 46.48 KB, 38.63K)

You can thank the 19th century church for the abomination of today

Attached: Kiwi_Stranger.mp4 (854x480, 1.38M)

Bump

Israel is CHRISTIANS.

The landmass named 'Israel' is ancient Judea. Both ancient Israel and Judea (geographic locations) were destroyed for their evil by God. This is Christian doctrine. Jesus outright says that the blood-spawn of Abraham, what the Jews of today claim to be, are in fact the spiritual children of the devil and will have no part in God's Kingdom.

The Bible is EXPLICITLY anti-Judaism (Pharisee) and implicitly anti-Hebrew/Semite. More or less the entirety of the Old Testament speaks to the vileness of those people, and how despite God sending numerous good individual Kings and Prophets, the masses remained a hollow and depraved people who would constantly forsake God. The Old Testament sees the Kingdom of Israel destroyed, and warns that Judea shall be destroyed if it does not repent and return when God sends His Messenger (Christ). As we know after rejecting Christ, the Temple and Judea is destroyed a mere generation later (just as Christ prophesied).

The Jews, also known as Pharisees, those Jesus called a brood of vipers and the children of devil; then became nomads who spread their evil all about the world. They have acted in accordance with what Jesus said they would, defiling all that is right in the world; family, sexuality, morality and purity. It is clear to any with eyes to see that the Jews do the work of the devil, just as one would expect of his children.

All Christians were radically opposed to these Jews for millenia. There was no period of 'Judeo-Christianity', it is a total myth. From the very beginning the two hated one-another, and this hatred has continued and will continue forever; for it is a battle between Good and Evil; God and the Devil; Life and Corruption. Martin Luther advocated the incineration of all Jewish texts and the destruction of their synagogues. All the Protestant Masters spoke about how the jews were the pharisees. The Early Church fathers spoke of the evil of the jews, as did various Popes. Eastern Orthodox churches STILL speak about the evil of the jews. The acceptance of judaism has only come about since atheists and jews infiltrated the churches of Rome and England.

I have less trouble letting actual aliens into our societies than letting niggers or foreigners in.

Israel was not a country 2000 years ago pagan larp kike

FTFY

12 And he began to speak unto them by parables. A certain man planted a vineyard, and set an hedge about it, and digged a place for the winefat, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country.

2 And at the season he sent to the husbandmen a servant, that he might receive from the husbandmen of the fruit of the vineyard.

3 And they caught him, and beat him, and sent him away empty.

4 And again he sent unto them another servant; and at him they cast stones, and wounded him in the head, and sent him away shamefully handled.

5 And again he sent another; and him they killed, and many others; beating some, and killing some.

6 Having yet therefore one son, his wellbeloved, he sent him also last unto them, saying, They will reverence my son.

7 But those husbandmen said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and the inheritance shall be ours.'

8 And they took him, and killed him, and cast him out of the vineyard.

9 What shall therefore the lord of the vineyard do? he will come and destroy the husbandmen, and will give the vineyard unto others.

10 And have ye not read this scripture; The stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner:

11 This was the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?

12 And they sought to lay hold on him, but feared the people: for they knew that he had spoken the parable against them: and they left him, and went their way.

What shall therefore the lord of the vineyard do? he will come and destroy the husbandmen, and will give the vineyard unto others.