Right-wing arguments for homo toleration

Mostly E. Michael Jones but I also looked at some Curt Doolittle and Dr. Woodley of Mena's research on spiteful mutation.

Basically the you look at Evolutionary development and religious taboos and find the reason is religion is genetic sanitation for the genetic pool via imposing harsh requirements to prevent spiteful mutations from overtaking the population.

It's not that hard. Sacred Traditions are "holy" because they separate the good genes from the bad in terms of choosing for social cooperation and fertility. Most of the religions did the job but some of them couldn't figure out the banning cousin marriage thing that is why ME/India are dogshit now.

My position would probably be called anti-gay, little do they know I'm gay as Christmas, but it's more fun when it's a secret. I don't think we should encourage homosexualituy, or normalise it, it is not normal or desirable behaviour for a healthy society, but my core morals are libertarian so I'd not go so far as legislating against sodomy.

Daily reminder that gays, transgenders and traps are mentally ill.

Attached: mareminder.jpg (195x259, 11.15K)

If you're going to recreationally embrace esoteric homosexuality, at least try to subvert the gay community from the inside, similar to the symbolic pol operation. If you're going to hook-up with and sleep with another dude, you can at least try leaving him a few redpills while you're at it.

>>>/bog/
and then when the weirdos turn into peat
>>>/oven/

"The peatland ecosystem is the most efficient carbon sink on the planet, because peatland plants capture carbon dioxide naturally released from the peat, maintaining an equilibrium." (Practical guide to the restoration of the Peatlands)

Our people are way out of equilibrium, it was foreign ways which denied the bogging of weirdos and look at us now. You have no right of standing in the way of Perchta and if you are a weirdo you will be forced into meeting.

Attached: lady of the bog.png (867x834, 1.1M)

Tacitus had no such understanding of 'homosexuals' because it is an anachronistic idea. He reports that infamous crimes were punished by burying their bodies in bogs, and one of them may have been anal penetration, although he is vague and so this isn't really clear. That Christian theologians and jurists did not like homosexuality is clear understood as a result of their Judaic roots, namely their devotion to the Hebrew Bible and the epistles of Paul.


This does not explain anything. I mean, just try and read this Dutton paper about 'mutational load'. He describes left handedness and autism as indicators as high mutational load, relying on scripture as a guide to psychology, further reaffirming my skepticism of the unseriousness of that profession. He also lists 'asymmetry' and 'poor general health' as indicators of mutation, which seems far more likely, given that these are overdetermined phenotypes as opposed to autism and left handedness, which are often associated with other positive traits, such as hypersystematizing thought and creativity, respectively. I don't doubt that religion relates to natural selection in important ways, but I wouldn't give it too much weight. The Jews were, until three centuries ago, among the most religiously devoted group in the world and they had serious inbreeding problems that did not at all weed out deleterious mutations, but rather promoted them through a stubborn endogamy.

E Michael Jones, does not, furthermore, deserve nearly the amount of attention he receives given his work. Having read them, I am not terribly impressed, though I am happy he is trying to get guys to stop watching porn and try to lead monogamous family oriented sexual lives. Also I like his Neocon Song.


Disgusting.

IMO, part of the idea behind the Negro/Homo thesis, is that homosexuality can be correlated with positive traits. Its strength would depend upon to what degree this premise holds.

Like how a stereotypical gay guy, at least a white one, might have a more developed sense of aesthetics than an average straight white man. So the right will push people with these phenotypes and archetypal qualities to the left by focusing on their most repulsive (to normies) traits, their sexuality, why the left then harnesses these traits for cultural marxism.

i agree
kill fags while they're young

There is no historical basis for homosexuality in the world, there is historically bisexuality in ancient Greece, they weren't homosexual though. Bisexuality should not be tolerated simply because of AIDS in the homosexual community. If AIDS had not existed then bisexuality would be tolerable. Homosexuality should never be tolerated, and unfortunately bisexuality can't be tolerated because of AIDS among homosexuals.

Words mean things, you disease riddled sodomite. Clearly the GRIDS has eaten away at your brain.