To all REED SEEJ fags on this board

The problem is there are conservative/neoliberals with connections to established parties who are feeding some wrong info and lacing the red pill.

InSoc is just as good. Being one sided makes you sound like a shill.

The conservative, rich white elite cannot benefit, as they are trying to do, by lying and lacing the red pill and trying to come out on top afterward with their user minions. None of the millionaire commentators currently in the media may be safe.

The vast majority of people do know there is a problem and the ones that don't are useless to us anyway. We don't need them.

The kikes power rests on a knifes edge and they know it. It only takes 5% of the population to lead the other 95% of sheep. We are just in need of a radical change in management. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Again, you need effective people to spread arguments/facts/memes/etc. supporting National Socialism, along with just having numbers in general, in order to achieve that, and the internet is by far the most efficient usable marketing tool in existence.
You aren't going to "win the hearts and minds of the people" with your pro-white bookclub of 10 people who go out and lift but don't focus on idea expansion.
You are going to "win the hearts and minds of the people" if you convert a NEET who then converts 10 other NEETs, who then also convert 10 others NEETs each, etc. with the group eventually becoming large enough to start being a noticeable force on normalfag social media platforms which is able to run mass online campaigns to the point in which the media takes notice (you are here).
This however causes push-back from the establishment in the form of censorship, hence why you need to continue with the most efficient mass expansion tactic of marketing to low status white people for as long as possible in order to have the best chance of hitting a critical mass within culture before it's too late.

t. Hasn't read Siege

Siege is an autobio of a white nationalist running a movement, not a revolutionary pamphlet. It's compiled from a series of articles that he wrote for his publication. His point about Charles Manson wasn't to revere him, it's to highlight the fact that the left will always associate you with killers and that it wouldn't repair your reputation as a white nationalist if you've denounced people like Earnest/Tarrant/Mason. In contrast the left praises their murders as a virtue. They openly support baby murder and terrorists like Nelson Mandela, but you want to go for optics and restrict yourself using hashtags. WHAT?

You'll fail, especially if you haven't read Siege. James Mason did the same shit that you've suggested a decade ago with a white majority and it didn't work at all. He learned the hard way that the opposition would cut you from the System in every single form possible. He faced deplatforming, lawsuits, feds, etc. His solution is to isolate yourself from the system and build a non-cucked platform that way.

Siege is a fed psyop to conflate WN with a half nigger petty thief who ordered White girls to kill a pregnant White woman.

Today op was not a faggot.

(checked)
Wonderfully well written response! I agree with your message wholeheartedly, but your response does not take into account the drop out of the system aspect of the book and the fact that revolution may one day be possible. Although the drop out “Varg” or “Orania” style method (whatever you want to call it) isn’t discussed as deeply as I think it should be in the book, it is nonetheless mentioned, worth reading over, and has proved to be successful in the real world. As for the revolutionary type activities during societal collapse mentioned in the book, they have arisen and proved to be effective in the fall of Yugoslavia (fascist militias organized and operated) and in Ukraine (the Azov battalion, sadly pretty zogged now).

TL;DR I agree with OP’s message, but the book does contain some interesting information that has worked in the real world. Read Siege, but don’t agree with it on everything and don’t be stupid.

Clarification, OP did address this, just not the “certain revolutionary activities” that can be undertaken during societal breakdown with a small group of friends. Polite sage for double post.