Out-Of-Africa debunking thread?

One thing to remember on race, is that every race is different genetically, especially the "blacks"
There was once a time in human history where there were many homos who were sapient, but they were not homosapien, only because blacks are still alive we call them homosapien, while they should really be called afri-homo

In my opinion, man came from the Mediterranean, splitting off into many groups, what would be the blacks gone south, what would be the Asians gone east, and what would be the whites gone west

Another thing to remember is that whites have the most neanderthal DNA, and the neanderthal were quite white, lived in snowy areas, and were very smart (in their own way) because such pressures needed them to be, I believe the neanderthal DNA is what makes whites truly white
Even if its been mostly bred out, or lost, the similarities that were found in regular humans naturally were chosen where there were none in any other left

Attached: 1610727414242321.png (1026x1026, 125.88K)

Broke theory
“Hominids” is the fail. They don’t exist. Mishmash of various races, giving “average” values. Does not equal new race “hominids”
Neanderthal = inbred sickos of uknown origins
Cro magnon man = HUMANS

Smoke that

Yes, I mean what exactly are you interested in within this subject because it's a huge one.
I'll presume you're interested in how mankind went from hunter-gatherers to settled agriculturalists in "the fucking desert" of the Middle East or the Fertile Crescent.
The standard answer to this is that it wasn't a desert. At least not in the fertile crescent. The earliest evidence (I'll get back to this later) of agriculture has been found approximately near the "F" on this map (pic 1) around 10,000-ish BC. Kinda close to the ancient temple at Gobekli Tepe.
At this time, this region was actually quite fertile. Indeed, there was even more land area as the sea-levels were lower and there are literally underwater temples off the shore of occupied Palestine to attest this.
So it wasn't a desert, nor was it a harsh landscape. In fact, there is evidence that there were Hippos at the time in Palestine and Syria and probably the Euphrates and Tigris river too. It was a lush region and we have every reason to believe that the people who lived here were very well fed.
Due to the richness of this area, mankind became settled in semi-permanent villages around 20,000 BC. At this time, (arguable) evidence of domesticated plants show up. This is most likely people sowing crops as a supplement to their hunting and gathering. This system allowed the population to grow large until you get pic #2 and the climate cooled during the Younger Dryas period. I believe that this acted as a shock to the populations here and forced them to rely more and more on this semi-domesticated grain to survive.
Indeed, during this period there is a dramatic decrease in the health and quality of skeletons. They're shorter, show signs of malnutrition, and lived shorter lives. And evidence in their teeth demonstrates that they began to eat way more grain than normal.

This I believe is what led to civilization as we know it.
Now… there is some vague evidence that there might have been agriculture of some kind around 23,000 BC but this evidence is very weak and so far no one has discovered any change in grain indicative of what we would call domestication. I can explain more but I believe that this was most likely people sowing wild grains around their dwellings and camps but not actively domesticating it.

Attached: 2.png (480x360 187.31 KB, 31.59K)

Why smoke that when I can smoke whatever the fuck you're smoking to make a post that fucking terrible, you stupid fucking shill

Attached: UzEMcb2.jpg (2000x1500, 306.48K)

Attached: 56670692.jpg (1160x623 1.05 MB, 105.61K)

Ah yes, I forgot Mesopotamia.
First of all, remember pic 1? Well the map is incorrect because it shows the Persian gulf in its current shoreline. Back in 10,000 BC it was actually more like this (Pic related) Also ignore the cities. They weren't there yet.
Anyway, this region while surrounded by desert was actually among the most fertile farmland on earth. This region was farmed by the serpent worshiping Ubaid culture (not their original name btw) which seems to have been either assimilated by or displaced by the Sumerians. And this culture created the first known city-states on earth.
The land around the two great rivers was once the most fertile and exciting place to be on earth.

Attached: 1.jpg (480x360, 56.64K)

This is the only true post on this entire thread. It is such as shame that Zig Forums has degraded to this state, but at least there is one voice of reason remaining in the masses.

Language is also an important thing to remember
Almost all spoken language can be traced to the first to even be spoken
The oldest peoples have their own languages too, but they've been lost in time however
Old language is still however found in tribal blacks, since they're so separated from everyone else

Attached: 488052629.png (1880x729, 183.56K)

Attached: 8812D4D6-E644-4397-A84B-E87EC4EA6A09.png (500x469, 124.26K)

Normal humans and Abos have little in common with modern Africans. Africa niggers sprung into existence after the Denisovan and Neanderthal were already extinct. You didn't diverge from Tyrone's ancestral lineage – they are a newer hybrid.