Spanish and Portuguese had a completely different relationship and method to their colonization, unlike the English and perhaps French. Spanish America, at its maximum, claimed extent extended from Alaska to Patagonia. There just wasn't enough people in Spain to fill it up, neither could they just outright slaughter these people. Because unlike the Mississippi basin where the people were hunter-gatherers and any civilization collapsed centuries ago, The Spanish had to deal with Empires that already had millions of people. They tried their best, emptying Galicia, the Canaries and a lot of the Basque country and exporting them to the Americas to settle there.
Many however did not find any wives, and instead settled with black or native women. My theory is that this was intentionally allowed by the Spanish and Portuguese in order to pacify and amplify the diversity in the colonies. This way, the identity of the people could indirectly be anchored to the motherland.
Of course, Spain was on its way down and finally failed because of Freemasonic revolutions.
They brought their own women. It was actually encouraged, it was easier right of passage for maritime transport. The problem is the numbers, as always, the breeding numbers.
For instance in a mining frontier town in Zacatecas only a handful of Spanish families ruled the town, plus the hacendado families that surrounded the town in the country side. At some point they needed to marry Spanish families from other towns. But those descendants barely replaced the positions of their fathers/uncles.
This above mentioned problem led to two situations: Marry distant and no so distant cousins… or "import" women from Spain/Portugal/Italy.
The first case can be seem at the Altos of Jalisco region, one of the most famous pockets of White people in Mexico to this day. Basically 15-ish families intermarried for centuries, but kept power, money, position.
The second has been researched in Central Mexico region where towns ran out of white girls and had to bring them similar to today's Russian brides.
The problem was always numbers. The most powerful Spanish held only temporary positions, and once their jobs ended in the Americas they had to return to Spain. If a Spanish from the Americas married a Spanish from Spain, most probably they would end up back in Spain.
Also, there is this idea that interbreeding between Europeans and the other races was common, but in Colonial times it wasn't. This became a thing as democratic/republic ideals appeared, and White guilt dominated the political scene.
In 1810, the first hours/days of the Mexican Independence War a Spanish priest Miguel Hidalgo, the leader of the revolt, had White guilt and captured and killed entire White populations of various cities and towns in Guanajuato area in revenge of what his own race has done against natives et al. These massacres are well documented.
Parker Bell
Looks like SJWism has always been with us. How do we permanently remove this mind virus from our race forever?
Matthew Miller
Kritza Perez looks like a Lightskin. She’s probably considered white in the America’s
James Stewart
If more Sephardic were in control of Weimar a holocaust wouldn’t have happened. Neither would a Weimar Germany.
Weren't Sephardi Jews also involved in the Confederacy? And the Union was influenced by the Ashkenazim?
Gabriel Allen
Don't turn this into "Good Jew, Bad Jew." A jew is a jew.
Evan Thomas
Miguel Hidalgo was actually a converso(A crhistian kike)
Brayden Clark
I'm not, just something I've kind of noticed. I know that Jews like to pretend to have a civil war with one another to attack against the middle. It is nice to be able to show historical examples of this phenomenon to people, though.
His article on Wikipedia says that he was born a Criollo. No mention of Jewish ancestry. Normally, I don't fully trust Wikipedia, but Wikipedia mentions Tomás de Torquemada's Jewish ancestry, so I don't see why they wouldn't mention Miguel Hidalgo's, being that Torquemada arguably caused much more havoc.
