Oh you.
Was Hitler defending Germany or was he simply attacking others?
Colton Gray
Ian Martinez
...
Gavin Butler
For extra kicks, try reporting it.
I'd love to see them have to dismiss reports on this shit, though I doubt they ever will – that'd be way too obvious.
Or would it?
Jack Evans
Okay I gotta go do IRL shit now, can't shit on you fags and your VPN circle-jerks all day.
When I get back, I hope you'll have that map I asked you about awhile ago. I know how much you love your maps, and if anyone can find what I asked for, it'll be you.
John Richardson
Good to hear.
Kicking us off the internet will end up being a mistake.
Christopher Clark
Don't think I'm under any obligation to continue posting in a thread.
The ZOG lies so much about WW2 that it is unbelievable. Your average "American" thinks of Hitler as some extreme version of an "American" 'Right'winger, and Stalin as some extreme version of the "American" "Left," when nothing could be further from the truth.
The issue of Poland, when it is discussed at all, is always under the "totalitarian" paradigm of nonsense. There is never any mention of Danzig. Hitler and Stalin just decided to pick on poor old Poland, for no reason at all!
Nevermind Austria. This is almost never discussed. Why did the National Socialist German Worker's Party invade a "Fascist" country and overthrow its government? The ZOG can give you stupid, bullshit answers, but it would rather simply avoid the topic altogether.
The 'Right' wing of the ZOG can talk about race all day long. That's because race is a nebulous concept, and they can tell one audience one thing (Kikes aren't white, they're sandniggers), and tell another audience something else (Kikes are our White Blood Brothers fighting darky Arabic hordes).
The 'Right' wing of the ZOG, however, is never comfortable discussion Nations and Nationalism. That's because to do so in any way that is coherent threatens to give people ideas about what a Nation even is. So they avoid these topics, like the plague.