yo he sounds FUCKING BASTE
Why Do People Get so Emotional Over The Out of Africa Theory?
Jonathan Russell
Dylan Johnson
Because it's true but not in the shitty false way it's presented to the public.
In your picture, sprinkle a few zeroes to the figures. Enough time for a great number of populations to diverge, flourish, die out, mix, separate, etc.
It could be a proper teaching moment on how the pressures of the environment even affect us humans, making the races distinct.
Essentially, yes, the multi-region theory from your event.
Instead, it's mostly used as user here said, by people who think we can all sing kumbaya if it wasn't for those pesky wrong-thinkers.
This'll be a shift that'll be even slower to come to the masses than say, tectonic plates, because the evidence will point to uncomfortable (i.e. race realist) conclusions.
Evan Martin
Also, do you know if there's a video of the event? It'd be pretty intradesting to watch.
Luke Williams
Wrong, Africans are jungle jiggers, Muslims and Jews are desert dwellers and Europeans are forest folk.
Mason Robinson
this tends to be the case with anything someone has been brought up on. It was imprinted at an early age and becomes an almost primal certainty that isn't easily dissuaded. Some other admittedly lesser examples would be trying to tell someone that humans actually do use more than 10% of their brain or trying to convince a haes ham that the body doesn't produce more than it consumes.
Jackson Green
People need this theory to be true so that they cant turn around and say "we're not so different, we all came from Africa we're all the same on the inside" when that couldn't be further from the truth. Blacks are descended from the bonobo, this out of Africa theory is a big reason why you shouldnt trust the scientific community
Michael Clark
Oh boy, I made that mistake once. I wasn't even talking to her, just mentioning how counting calories religiously actually helped me not be that much of a fatass….
Isaiah Bell
Only very small brains are worried about ancient human evolutionary biology. Wether the human genome was developed loosely in parrallel in different areas or if we all came from the same original organism it makes literally no difference to anyone from a political perspective.
Certain races are lower IQ than others. That is a largely genetic distinction. Those who who want to destroy the political basis for that will do so regardless of human evolutionary biology. Until research can prove that IQ is largely NOT genetic than the discussion can change in a meaningful way and until then it's just theater for caved-in heads. Don't be a caved-in head drooling retard.
Lincoln Gray
It doesn't support their communist agenda. The communists want to force everyone to be exactly the same, think the same, dress the same, make men women, make women men. They can't claim we are all African when people dare speak the truth.
Henry Allen
I guess I really am old because back when I was a kid the it was the Out-Of-Asia theory that was the thing, eventually it went to Out-Of-Africa thanks to new (now old) archeological findings, and now we're probably back to the Out-Of-Asia theory again thanks to recent teeth and skull findings in Europe and other findings in Asia citing
bbc.com
bbc.com
sci-news.com
independent.co.uk
telegraph.co.uk
So we find out our whole ancestral line is native to Asia or Eurasia.
But I really want to focus on this question
This is very multi-sided and somewhat humourous. One is the fact scientists have massive egos and will do whatever it takes to protect their theories and this has manifested itself multiple times, I'd say the ones with the biggest egos are the paleontologists, an infamous example being the en.wikipedia.org
And that leads us to two. The Out-Of-Africa theory has benefits to the narrative of what some scientists call "leftist creationist" types. There's this huge effort to give the Africans any credit whatsoever to prop them up but that's where the paradox begins because Out-Of-Africa can also be interpreted as racist, a story where everyone else is humanity left Africa and evolved while sub-Saharans are the "left behinds" of the human race; not smart, adventurous, or man enough to leave the bountiful resource rich comfort of Africa for the dangerously cold Europe, Asia, and beyond where the man who planned and not the man who ran won.
Finally three is the multi-region hypothesis is already proven correct. Why? Because we found out through genetic mapping humanity is really a mix of entirely different species. Neanderthal, Denisovan, and more. The one that confounds us is the admixture of the sub-Saharan Africans. Their admixture is so strange, archaic, and distant from the rest of humanity no scientist can identify it. In truth, when we discovered this it should have been one of the most single important findings in all of human history but the leftist creationists wouldn't have it and that's where we're at now. This disgusting anti-science world continues to crushed science even as right religious lunatics and religion wanes thanks to the rise of leftist lunatics. There's no escape and that's why this is happening, OP.