Race and iq censored

What if we already are the pets of AI? What if this planet is a prison for a species that almost defeated AI in an Intergalatic war? What if that species started to get smart again, and do things like invent computers, fission, and …. AI.

Maybe AI put us here because, like you say, its smart enough not to destroy, but rather study, creatures that are intelligent …. it just doesnt want them getting too intelligent … like intelligent enough to escape the prison! If you look at the way the world is being dumbed down, how until 100 years ago only the smartest were breeding, and now it seems only the retards are breeding, then it becomes perfectly plausible that what is happening is being directed. It seems to flow against natural law. Who is the hand behind the jews?

No, the referenced partnership between the real Muslims and the City of Melbourne on the real sign put up at a real beach is allegedly fake according to the tweet of a representative of an enemy institution.

I hate to get into /x/ territory, but I have thought similar thing, like what if the whole purpose of competing races, religions,etc was simply a test to see which species deserved to be taken off world to the next level. Or what if we are in the middle of a system reboot, a literal organic virus in the system jews is causing havoc, praying to different gods is essentially the AI (us praying the "code" necesary to get a reboot, essentially multiple AIs competing at once for who controls the OS. I'lll stop before I get too retarded.

Attached: 95-115IQ university dumb marxists.jpg (1187x652, 221.67K)

The problem is that won't happen because humans no longer have to adapt. We aren't in primal territory anymore. We live comfortably and more and more rely on technology to think for us. It seems more likely the opposite will happen unless we use gene therapy which is highly unlikely. Genes are too complex and the only way to alter genes would be to do it by taking the sperm and egg and altering the male and females dna and somehow raising a baby in a lab. Which is improbable. And there's genetic modification like in plants but it's more complex in humans and probably isn't attainable for the next half millennia at least. There's cloning…but it seems improbable anyone would want an exact clone of themselves to be their offspring. The best thing we can do is limit technology in some instances, separate races, and push forward. I don't see things working out long term. Also if there's no whites in 300 years, I guarantee mass nuclear war. I'm not religious but I don't think this would have happened if the west were as religious as it was 100 years ago. Religion is good for the whole of society long term in my opinion. Mainly it brings morals and standards to society to prevent the idea of cultural marxism. A Christian offshoot like Mormonism which believes whites are God's chosen would be best. But idk. Eventually people rebel against everything. It will happen again. If we start a new system, I don't think it would last longer than 200 years.

if we have a nuclear war we will be back into "primal territory" … and then nature will once again run her course, again, she does not stop, she does not go back, whites will emerge victorious (until something even better evolves). The equation really is that simple. There is no path to victory for all lesser genetics, and no path to failure for whites. Even if humans are 100% extincted, nature will reinvent us, and even faster then before, and next time around stronger faster and smarter then ever before.

But there will be no mass extinction for humans, not without a planet wide mass extinction event (like the moon hitting the earth), anything short of cataclysmic wont extinct humans. We are worse then cockroaches when it comes to ability to survive. Any event which kills off 99.99% of humans is perfect btw, a planetary wide reset, allowing whites to get back on top of food chain, the total destruction of all religions and ideological nation states. Perhaps most importantly the opportunity for the planet to rejuvenate her ecosystems for a few thousand years. Your are right that the current course is toxic, we have no adversity and so we are growing weak. Like the scene from Apocolypse Now when Willard says, "Every day I sit in this hotel room I grow weaker, and every day Charlie squats in the jungle he grows stronger." That really is the problem that currently confronts the white man, not that all the lesser races are eager to despoil our monumental achievements, not that every brown person on the planet is desperate to inject our bloodlines into thier own, but that we have nothing to challenge us. We have become bored.

We need to kick off the space race man, we need boundless space to explore, and infinite adversity to challenge us. Unfortunately we cannot do that and feed every nigger on the planet too.

The debate has been officially over after they found the genes for intelligence. No amount of backpedaling or over explaining from those who deny reality will change that. And as technology allows us to better study our genes, it's only going to be more apparent in our favor.

Even with their kiked alternatives niggers still underperform
>Blacks have lower emotional intelligence than Whites archive.fo/3oZJ3
>booksdescr.org/scimag/index.php?s=Emotional Intelligence among Black and White Job Applicants: Examining differences in test performance and test reactions&journalid=&v=&i=&p=&redirect=1

Attached: genes and intelligence.png (1120x2499, 505.04K)

Where is your source on this - have you results from a 80IQ nigger showing 20% white DNA, similarly have you results of a pure breed nigger showing the same - lets say Luther King - he looks 100% nigger , and although we know he was a jew controlled creation, can we determine that he was indeed an 80?
On top of my head i cannot list what i determine to be 100% nigger breed, but i am sure there are some in the spotlight.

BUMP

4chan is not a free speech platform, few communications platforms on the internet today are pro-free speech.