We still somehow have “freedom of association”. You are allowed to associate with whomever you choose. I believe if there is a charge of “discrimination” in a company this is usually more of an internal thing most likely than government, done by Human Resources (probably to avoid courts and bad press). If it were to go to court it’s a hard charge to prove since you have to prove intent. Defense can just plead ignorance and “I was just hiring best people for the job”. Very difficult to demonstrate malicious intent even existed
Nolan Lee
Use their own jewed rules and bigotry towards whites right back against them. Judo. They recently ruled that discrimination based on political beliefs is perfectly legal. A restaurant, bar, or other organization can deny service based on a persons political views (or presumably perceived political views.) You live in a crazy world where what someone shoves up their ass is "protected" but how you vote isn't. Same with taxes: they have a clear and evident "disparate impact" on whites -and since they like to try and use "disparate impact" as a weapon against whites, it ought to be used right back against them. Why isn't La Raza being sued into the dirt like the Klan for every single murdered American whose death was essentially aided, abetted and instigated by that Mexican hate group?
Use their own fucking rules against them.
Nicholas Smith
I actually did "Fair Housing" training a week ago. There ARE ways around it, you just need something that gives a HUD exception. Religious groups are a good example.
The outstanding issue is "disparate impact", look it up. It's insane, basically saying you can be raycis even while following every other standard if something disproportionately effects another group. If you have policies against criminals, for example, you'll have to relax them to accommodate a black potential tenant. The reasoning is if it's not a violent record, it's fine goy. This is intentionally nebulous but the purpose is very clear. They'll send over agents to determine whether you are discriminating and follow up with an audit. Even putting colored residents in one building exclusively is verboten. The point is that they'll find a way to get you to pay out one way or another. It's state enforced miscegenation.
There are a couple ways around it: Basically, break up the property ownership. If you operate as a franchise, that's a no go. It'd still be considered under 1 owner. However, if you're able to sell to like-minded individuals to operate as a landlord, you're good to go. Religious organizations are free from almost all FH initiatives. There's a fair amount of paperwork that has to be done with the IRS because you're transferring from a simple church into a property owning religious organization. Helps to have friends in government. This is why there are so many jew communities segregated from everyone else in New York and NYC.
It's good in theory but keep in mind the moment that we poke our heads up, HUD, the IRS, and countless prosecutors will smell blood in the water. That's a slam dunk legally. The key term to remember is "disparate impact". The laws are never enforced on nigs or kikes but they'll drop the hammer the moment there is any real influence that gets exerted.
A corporation is difficult to hide behind due to the CRA. A trust can easily be targeted as "Conspiracy". They know they don't actually have to prove anything, their object will be to damage infrastructure and eat away resources.
That being said, look into the Alaskan Indian corporations. They've been running as a tribal piggybank for a while. Some of the precedent set actually spills over into regular (not tribal) law in states with a large firewater population.
Evan Thomas
man, good luck in this endeavor. Lots of shills always trying to make us feel small and cornered, always trying to push the narrative that we are not vast and diverse (we are) and that we have many allies everywhere. Allies in thought and desire.
But for your own point, I have been reading some stuff on taxes and business, and the author advocates STUDY. More so than anything else. Study of the law, getting some classes and courses to comprehend it better. I think it would be the same for you.
Maybe buy a few books that go on the discrimination aspect of the law? But also look for exceptions, and how the law works in other ways? Maybe scour some of the lawsuits around it to see where people may have escaped. Lots of opportunity to find such means as there is no way in hell that its completely impregnable. Reality is complex, far more complex than the law system and without constant updates, which it doesnt get, in all of its dribble, cracks are going to appear, or are already there. The only thing that one needs to have is a good awareness of the whole system.
Jordan Martinez
The laws of man are arbitrary and ever changing. Keeping up with how to follow them is an exercise in futility.
Following the Natural Laws is easy in this regard: as long as you are being creative, ie: creating something, you can generally do what you want.
Zachary Peterson
You can't discriminate if you provide a service, you can easily create groups that restrict membership based on 'culture' rather than ethnicity. Charities that only help people of a certain ethnicity are probably legal too, if they made them illegal they would have to ban all the 'help LGBT only' or 'help only black kids' charities that already exist.
Joshua Wood
That's bullshit. Only in areas where the average yearly temperature is already in that range. That technology is called dirt.
