Spooked and proud

I'm spooked but why shouldn't I be spooked? You can't give me a reason that isn't "stop liking what I don't like" and gay moralising that makes you spooked. Me believing in spooks and acting upon them is just me defying the fact they don't actually exist, and doing that makes me a a more virile person with a more life-affirming worldview than you will ever be.

Attached: escaroso negro.mp4 (480x320, 4.91M)

Appeal to spook man is what retards do who think they have uncovered the pinnacle of philosophy. Unironic Stirnerposters are probably nihilistic 15 year olds going through their edgy phase The other half are probably trolls who post Stirner to piss people off (I know I do)

The only spook here is that you've misunderstood Stirner's point enough to think that to be the case.

Attached: Egotist monster.png (523x452, 6.1K)

Because spooks make you act against your own interest.

washing bears are so adorable

You really need to read Stirner. He's abused by children for sure, but if you think his philosophy is just solipsism like Marx, then you've been hit…. you've been struck by…… and smooth apparition!

Because debating issues, call them spooks if you want, helps filter ideas for a society in order to see what's best for them. You can believe something sure, but can you back that up as being in the interest of not only yourself but your fellow egoists?

Debating is gay

Debating things isn't going to get you anywhere and won't change minds, let alone filter ideas on the behalf of a whole society. The ideas that win out after your faggot filtering process will be the ideas of the ruling class. Even if you were to have the most successful ideas, the average person is too comfortable with their Netflix and Burger King to even entertain your ideological preaching. The movements of the twentieth century that changed minds and then succeeded did so because the system was up shit creek, didn't have things under wraps and was able to be threatened with alternatives that could be sold to the average person.
None of this is true today. Up shit creek today still offers far more comfort to the average person than it did back then, the system is constantly developing ways to keep things under wraps even if things suddenly were to get as bad as they were back then for the average person, and no alternatives that aren't milquetoast controlled opposition will be taken seriously so long as the previous two points are the case. For a look at how devoid of revolutionary potential the average person is, look no further than the fact that the Arab Spring "revolutions" all seem to coincide with spikes in food prices. Most people are perfectly willing to tolerate continuing inflation and a declining standard of living, so long as they are able to keep their bellies full today.
The revolutions of the future are going to be in third world countries and will either be put down or succeed depending on whether they have been orchestrated by the CIA. The future is liberalism until something on the level of every major city being nuked or total human obsolescence occurs and totally destroys the current system physically. Debating political ideas on the internet is now and will continue to be the domain of bored zoomers and autistic outcast incels who will never achieve anything political beyond huffing their own hot air. The average person gives a shit about as much as they do about Jehovah's Witnesses at their doorstep and this will NOT change. If you post on Zig Forums, anything that changes any of this will most likely kill you in the process anyway.

Cool your autism for a moment.
My post was in the context of a society with already established socialism, and not the modern political climate, everything you just said is right but not in the context of my post. Debate there is different since it's deciding what policies to implement and what not, if people choose to stay apolitical so be it.

how the fuck are we going to get there if this is the case nigga

Attached: hitchens lake.gif (304x280, 683.63K)