What's the verdict, user? Good introductory material?

So you got your theory from memes and youtube e-celebs, got it.

Only illiterates who never actually have read Marx claim that he is unreadable.
marxists.org/subject/marxmyths/humphrey-mcqueen/article.htm

In the same way that radicals can help reformists (by exerting pressure and making reform seem like a lesser evil to the ruling class), reformists can help radicals (by drawing attention to how things could be better without scaring them away first).

Attached: hotpockets.png (503x522, 286.32K)

In the West that's largely true. When a firm goes insolvent there is usually just another holding taking over. I'm making the muh risk argument but the law of value demands from the workers in co-ops to lower their own wages to stay in business or to pay themselves out and go out of business.

bump

>>>/marxism/239
>>>/marxism/240

Read Marx.

Attached: MLs_quoting_marx.jpg (640x435, 33.89K)

Stop linking me your cult literature

The Video Of The Book, released today:

youtube.com/watch?v=eU-AkeOyiOQ

The first quote is a bit of a mistranslation. Marx always makes a distinction between Genossenschaften and Kooperativfabriken, the former is what Wolff argues for, the latter is an actual new mode of production.

The second quote literally argues for a planned economy.

The third quote argues for seizing political power.

As for the other post, Marx means cooperative production on a societal level. This also isn't what Wolff argues for.

Nice attempt though to justify Wolff though.