there are people browsing this board who are not anarchists

I get my ideology from memes and can't read past a headline or title.
Mutal Aid is more comprehensive and Malatesta or Berkman have better introductions.

Attached: D9AXgRIXkAAc2Nu.jpeg (750x583, 98.7K)

This but while Nietzsche was right about most things, he was wrong about Christianity

Why, so I can be propagandized by a poorly-read straw man?

Kaczynski is spot on when it comes to radlibs and only a radlib in denial would deny that. In all seriousness though, the worst part of ISAIF is the part on leftists, people need to read it for what’s actually important — the part on technology. Good go.yim will be chomping at the bit to get their Neuralink™ porky-mind control soon enough so it’s more relevant than ever

Attached: 90301059-21DC-4755-BAED-33F3987F64A6.png (406x395, 157.67K)

Industrial society and its future is an excellent read in its own right for the environmentalism, but it excels in describing lifestylism, particularly leftism as surrogate activism. When Ted negatively explains leftism, you feel hurt and react negatively back (hence "poorly-read strawman"). But that's not the point. Graduating your understanding of politics to greater than just leftwing vs. rightwing is important for self-actualization. Personally, I only started dabbling in leftist literature around 2015 because rightwingers are terrible at explaining systems of power.

The main critique of leftism Kaczynski offers is its fetishization of weakness and its feelings of inferiority:

Attached: pills here.jpg (2800x830, 577.27K)

On the liberals, sure. He's just another dummy trying to conflate them with actual leftists however.

Attached: anarchists_read,_marxists_don't.png (730x227, 15.12K)

Being pro-intellectual is gay

No, to stop being an anarchist you have to actually realise how stupid and naive your plan is.

...