Federal judge sides with Trump administration on 'bump stocks' ban

Full auto weapons were banned at the height of the Chicago gangster problems in the twenties. The bumpstock was a circumvention of the law. So if you want to bitch about constitutional rights blame Al Capone.

what is a class III?
britcuck

Wrong and misleading. When you tell people not to comply, you need to be clear: if you allow yourself to be captured alive, you will lose in legalsystem.gov, again.

i still have yet to see any detailed information on this from any official source. from what i can still see, the bans are on a state-by-state basis, so in what way is this a federal ban?
also, do they plan to grandfather them in? buyback program? confiscation?

Coat hanger…

The law, last time I read over it, didn't include improvised solutions like belts. Which is funny to me, since the people who could really do damage with bumpfiring know this method. And watch, as they ban bumpfire stocks, suddenly a lot more people will know about the belt method.

The ban is phrased in such a way that they could slap you with anything.

are you talking about the belt loop thing? its just called bump firing. and you dont need a belt loop, you can just do it from your shoulder. the law makes no attempt to make bump firing illegal, it just attempts to ban devices that aid in it.
it doesnt even ban 2-stage triggers.

trump says otherwise

Attached: tr.jpg (898x628, 51.31K)

Laws restricting something to the point where its out of reach to the average man is the same as banning it in practice.