loooool you just single handedly ripped youtube a new asshole. gg
YOUTUBE’S SINISTER PEDOPHILE COMMUNITY CONTINUES TO FLOURISH
Leo Thompson
Brody Gonzalez
Alternatives To State-run Social Media: >>>/prepare/20 | archive.fo
web.archive.org
Thomas Perry
Alternatives to Google
qwant.com
duckduckgo.com
startpage.com
ixquick.com
searx.me
ecosia.org
search.yacy.net
goodgopher.com
1776free.com
bing.com
Alternatives for Twitter
gab.ai
shitposters.club
sealion.club
freezepeach.xyz
voat.co
iscute.moe
social.ufeff.club
Alternatives for Youtube
d.tube
bit.tube
brighteon.com
invidio.us
pe.ertu.be
ugetube.com (gun tutorials)
hooktube.com
liveleak.com
bitchute.com
dissenter.com
minds.com
streambotz.com
Alternatives to Facebook
unseen.is
joinalbin.com
usa.life
signal.org
freedom.social
mastodon.social
steemit.com
joindiaspora.com
snabbo.com
medium.com
spreely.com
Benjamin Stewart
They’re not lewd vids. They are talking about how pedos find nip slips and shit like that in family videos and then comment with timestamps, or all the gross shit they’d like to do if they were left alone with peoples kids. Usually it’s the kids themselves posting the videos which is even worse because they start getting messages from all the perverts on the whole internet. That’s the main reason for the “no comments” thing as opposed to taking the videos down. Without the pedos there’s no problem.
It’s also not really a “sinister pedo community,” but a passive participation scheme.. kinda like leaving chalk marks on houses with unprotected WiFi. So it’s difficult to identify which users are jacking it to your kids.
YT has always tracked which parts of your videos are most played, tho, so if you look at your analytics and people have watched the same 3 seconds of a 20-minute video of your daughter on the beach over a million times, it might be prudent to look at that clip yourself and see why.
Ryder Walker
The entire community shouldn't suffer for the (alleged) actions of a few. By all means have guidelines but one can't legislate against every possible eventuality based on someone else's sexual fetish. Nip-slips, up-skirts and the like are not sexual in themselves and don't need to be censored. It's shit like this that sexualizes children early and creates havoc with the internet. Stop meddling.
Mason Ward
Children imitate what they see.
And what they're bombarded with becomes normal to them.
What have they seen?
For the last 20 years is that by being a whore , sexualizing yourself and lying about your age, you too can become rich and famous.
Get knocked up by the right guy? Instant stardom. Dancing sexy on youtube and someone famous likes you enough to fuck you? You're a star now kiddo.
tl;dr :You don't need pedos to groom children, leave them alone long enough and they'll groom themselves due to the society we live in.
Justin Diaz
kys christfag
Michael Hernandez
Adrian Thomas
Being sexually into children is natural why are you moralfags this much of a crybaby
John Ortiz
It’s not really that they’re into kids that bothers me. Perverts quietly enjoying someone else’s videos in an inappropriate way is beyond my control, and it’s better than molesting someone else’s kids… but when they put gross/disturbing comments on the video it crosses the line.
I’d propose that anything you’d say about my children that would elicit an immediate punch to the face should also not be expressed as a comment to a video. It’s common sense shit really.
And yeah I could avoid social media entirely, and I do that now, but this also makes me the one weirdo everyone knows who’s “paranoid about Facebook” or “thinks people are spying on him.” A lot of stuff happens in my extended family and social circle that I never hear about, because nobody writes or uses the phone anymore.