...
Wikipedia Is Now Banned in China in All Languages
Cooper White
Michael Anderson
You have the "Stupidity" sorry…
The Socialists are politically aligned… The Left has a long term plan that involved taking down the patriarchy…
Do you honestly believe that White Males are genetically programmed to conspire?
Why should anyone talk to you?
So, why do people try to talk you out of being Leftist?
Is it because they're a deplorable sexist, racist, scum bag? No.
People are trying to talk you out of being a Leftist because they feel sorry for you.
Hudson Howard
Wiki is an untrustworthy source of information.
I remember years ago there was three or four wikipages that mentioned the Great, the wikipage about him, the wikipage about gaza, the wikipage about Alexandria, i think he was also mentioned in the Macedonia wikipage, each page made mention of dates, such asriunf when he was born, lived, invaded Gaza and died, using the dates from all those pages meant Alexander had lived for 600 years.
Those pages have since been sorted but it just shows how unreliable Wikipedia can be as a source of information.
I knew a person personally whom there was a wikipage about him, there were numerous claims on it that i knew were not true so I asked him and he told me that the press had made up things about him and that Wikipedia had cited those inaccurate news stories about him.
This is the main problem with Wikipedia, they will happily cite newsmedia (they've seemed trustworthy) without ever asking the person the story is about to verify if its true or not.
Wikipedia is selective with the truth, they like to suppress info, for example it's a known fact that Freddy Murcury whilst suffering from HIV and AIDS knowing intentionally had unprotected sex and infected others, there was a documentary on this in which his victims spoke out, also victims have received compensation from his estate since his death, these things are fact yet Wikipedia admins refuse to allow such info on the Freddy Murcury page and abuse and threaten anyone whom suggests such content.
Wikipedia has double standards, for example prince Harry's wife is black yet Wikipedia wont allow her wikipage to say that, they say that she identifies as mixed race and so that's what they've put, but remember that white US women whom identified as black (I can't recall her name but I'm sure you know who I mean) Wikipedia won't allow her page to say she's black even though that's what she identifies as.
In one wikipages discussion section I once saw two contributors openly conspiring to add false onto to a wikipage, the plan was one of them would create a blog page on which he'd write false info, the other guy would then add that false to the wikipage by citing the blog and the false info on it, wiki admins did nothing about this.
These are just some examples of what Wikipedia is like.
Wikipedia is an untrustworthy source of information, I wish other countries would ban it also.
Alexander Adams
I meant Alexander the Great
Wiki is an untrustworthy source of information.
I remember years ago there was three or four wikipages that mentioned Alexander the Great, the wikipage about him, the wikipage about Alexander the geat, the wikipage about gaza, the wikipage about Alexandria and the wikipage about Macedonia wikipage, each page made mention of dates, such as when he was born, the period he lived, when he invaded Gaza and as to approximately when he died, using the dates from all those pages meant Alexander had lived for 600 years.
Those pages have since been sorted but it just shows how unreliable Wikipedia can be as a source of information.
I knew a person personally whom there was a wikipage about him, there were numerous claims on it that i knew were not true so I asked him and he told me that the press had made up things about him and that Wikipedia had cited those inaccurate news stories about him.
This is the main problem with Wikipedia, they will happily cite newsmedia (they've seemed trustworthy) without ever asking the person the story is about to verify if its true or not.
Wikipedia is selective with the truth, they like to suppress info, for example it's a known fact that Freddy Murcury whilst suffering from HIV and AIDS knowing intentionally had unprotected sex and infected others, there was a documentary on this in which his victims spoke out, also victims have received compensation from his estate since his death, these things are fact yet Wikipedia admins refuse to allow such info on the Freddy Murcury page and abuse and threaten anyone whom suggests such content.
Wikipedia has double standards, for example prince Harry's wife is black yet Wikipedia wont allow her wikipage to say that, they say that she identifies as mixed race and so that's what they've put, but remember that white US women whom identified as black (I can't recall her name but I'm sure you know who I mean) Wikipedia won't allow her page to say she's black even though that's what she identifies as.
In one wikipages discussion section I once saw two contributors openly conspiring to add false onto to a wikipage, the plan was one of them would create a blog page on which he'd write false info, the other guy would then add that false to the wikipage by citing the blog and the false info on it, wiki admins did nothing about this.
These are just some examples of what Wikipedia is like.
Wikipedia is an untrustworthy source of information, I wish other countries would ban it also
Michael Howard
Fuck off CIDF.
Adrian Walker
Wikipedia officially has a short list of what newsmedia it deems trustworthy to cite but they're all US newsmedia and like all countries US newsmedia is pro-biased towards their own country and biased towards others countries they don't like and tell inaccurate storiescans spread propaganda, all counties newsmedia so this but wikipedia only cites US newsmedia which makes Wikipedia a source of misinformation and disinformation
Bentley Parker
Sorry my phone fucked it auto corrects everything wrong
Wikipedia officially has a short list of what newsmedia it deems trustworthy to cite but they're all US newsmedia and like all countries US newsmedia is pro-biased towards their own country and biased towards others countries they don't like and they tell inaccurate stories and spread propaganda, all counties newsmedia do this but wikipedia only cites US newsmedia which makes Wikipedia a source of misinformation and disinformation
Justin Collins
600 years of alien-conspired soul trapping reincarnation slavery.
Carter Kelly
Is Britannica.com banned in China too?
Grayson Peterson
Only leftists are allowed to put up tin foil hat shit there which is the problem.