None of that is happening in Europe or the US you simpleton. That's fucking insulting to actual genocide victims.
Ethnic replacement of Europeans
He never argued against socialism nor he just asked why "socialist" support this shit.
But sometimes, especially at american hours, this board is so retarded that would rather scare away people looking for answers and that basically agree with us just for the thrill of calling them Zig Forums or whatever.
So an uncohesive group with no organizational structure composing less than 13% of the population is literally committing genocide because some of them have committed a crime?
Yeah, but I bet his original parents were crackheads anyway which is why he got sent to a foster home. Honestly does it matter if a kid gets sent to a foster home with a different ethnicity/religion? There is no clause stating that it isn't - if they're a stable home that's better than whatever got him sent there then fine I say.
And yet, ethnic Norwegians are being replaced. It's what is happening. Why do you bring racial purity into this?
The ends are the same, ethnic Norwegians will be a minority in their own country. And actually some people do want to make Norway less ethnically Norwegian, want to decrease the % of ethnic Norwegians for the sake of it. The leading factor is globalism and the capitalist system, but your point that nobody is pushing for it is false. I don't care if there is an agenda or not though - it is happening which is what I want to stop.
The issue is not that we are not having children, the issue is mass immigration. Having fewer children is generally a good thing in this polluted world. Why do people bring this up all the time? Don't they care about the environment? Weak argument.
Norwegians will combine their linages with immigrants, and the native population will not be like it was, but something different. Am I a racist if I want my children to look like me? Or if I want a future without ethnic tensions?
The case is that we are not even mixing with them. That happens at a very low %. What is happening is that our % and numbers are decreasing while it's the opposite for the foreigners.
I agree that targeting, killing, and expropriating populations is wrong, but you understand by your definition of alien and native that the boers cannot be considered native and the bantu alien right?
Was this forced or was this an adoption?
Dude immigrants are 13% of the population and net migration is decreasing per year. If this happens it won't for centuries if not millennia
dumb statement proven wrong a thousand times over, latest being venezuela
All points have and are happening. Pic is example of most commonly refuted, rest is easily demonstrated too.
Come on now.
Also not 13% of pop.
Also not sole perpetrator.
Given the sheanenigans of British govt, hardly a logical conclusion, and even if it were the case, still not an argument for the decision.
p.s. jihad is personally mandatory to muslims and takes multiple forms as well (i.e. demographics, economic - other than active).
Sole exception is through following conditions: non muslims are not present in muslim lands and enough muslims are already conducting jihad in foreign countries as to not make it a personal obligation, but simply a community one (meaning individual muslims aren't directly required to take up arms).
From "reliance on the traveller".
Venezuela is as socialist as Norway.
Not socialist
Closing the border, let the economy collapse and introduce a centrally (and locally) planned economy.
What control will ethnic Norwegians be of the situation the day we are say 20% in Norway? What if the majority unites against us for some reason?
I mean, Communist China didn't last
If there were one ethnicity, they couldn't have funded these tensions. The tensions existed before the funding.
Native European workers generally oppose mass immigration. There will be no Communist revolution because believe it or not, most people do not like the idea of being ethnically replaced.
This better not turn into another anti-natalist argument
Ethnic tensions are derived almost entirely from the economic and material scarcity.
Which is caused by?
I think I just felt a part of me die from reading that and all my attempts at discussion made void.