World Hunger

I have a school project on world hunger, whom it affects and why, and how to solve it. Why do the statistics show that less and less people are hungry when capitalism is supposed to make everything worse?(IMF redefines the poverty line constantly)

Attached: Screenshot_2018-05-14-09-50-36-1.png (1280x446, 55.57K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Holodomor#Extensive_export_of_grain_and_other_food
youtube.com/watch?v=SMBJ_nQ4sTA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Wrong. Read Marx

capitalism is not bad after all?

I'll try to use favourite sheeple question, have (you) ever tried to run a business? Have you ever tried to sell anything(like food) to people without money?

The problem of capitalism is it's inefficiency - third world farmers do not earn enough capital to improve farming outputs fast enough because people in countries they live in do not have jobs which can provide them with enough capital to buy stuff. Not to mention great amount of land in third world belonging to bourgeoise in first world producing stuff to be sold in first world rather than home population (because it's more profitable). Try to find graphs of separate countries and you'll see which underdeveloped countries are the best are at reducing poverty (protip: it's china)

It's all China.

Accept that China is communist already you fucking pieces of shit baizuo kill yourselves.

so hunger might have increased in capitalist countries, but China has collectivised distribution so well that the overall world hunger is decreasing?

China is capitalist country like almost every single country in the world - state capitalism is still capitalism.


That was true in socialist countries. Chinese government is doing everything it can to provide everyone with job which pays enough wage to buy food.

In conclusion
malnourishment and world hunger is lowering due to chinese government graviously offering slave labour to poor people?

*graciously

The poor folks in third world countries can improve their situation by selling things to foreigners who have a lot more wealth. The doomsday scenario of people starving to death because everything is sold to foreigners only happens in authoritarian countries where the peasants own nothing; Perfect example: The Soviet Union. In a private property regime, people either only sell the surplus or immediately buy other food items with the proceeds, which is what happens in third world countries. People sell things that require manual labor like cucumbers, melons & vanilla beans and buy industrial produce like wheat and rice.

Attached: answers.png (2048x1998 661.98 KB, 2.64M)

Hello, where are the proofs?

Capitalism does not "make everything worse", it makes wealth inequality worse. To very loosely quote marx, if i remember correctly:
Capitalism is more complex than "it is evil and makes everything worse". The concentration of means of production away from feudal holdings and small farmers, into larger entities is necessary for the creation of socialism, according to marx, and capitalism is very good at that.

Also as others said, it is mostly China that has vastly improved. Keep in mind also that while "undernourishment" may be going down, whatever that is defined as (and look up how they defined it, they keep changing it), malnourishment is going up in first world countries. Many children even in european welfare states do not have the ability to eat breakfast or dinner every day, but that is technically not starving.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Holodomor#Extensive_export_of_grain_and_other_food

Communism is a movement not a state of affairs. Kill yourself philistine you embarrass the tank.

Yeah, that's how good communism is.

But the prerequisite of that is that it does need to move towards communism, not away from communism towards capitalism

Why are you cucks so mad about Chinese people living well?

Attached: guangzhou-5th-for-tourism.jpg (704x460, 75.23K)

Working conditions in china are pretty terrible though

Very stupid contention since Marx said that capitalism is moving towards communism.

Also you need advanced productive forces to produce communism so there's no contradiction in the CPC's plan.

They're getting better, what more do you want?

If you come from feudalism. China used to be socialist, and is moving more and more to capitalism. You absolute retard.
There was massive improvements in production under socialism.

Not really tbh. They mercilessly crush any workers movements and they arrest maoists who demand better working conditions, or maoists who read mao.

Socialism isn't a thing.

They should arrest maoists so that's good.


Stick to verifiable claims.

I bet you think the USSR privatising everything is communism because now they have capitalism and "capitalism is moving towards communism".
Better keep privatising things and creating social classes and massive wealth inequality to reach communism.

Attached: neutral porky.png (344x429 324.54 KB, 121.26K)

youtube.com/watch?v=SMBJ_nQ4sTA

US confirmed communist state