Hey guys Zig Forums here...

Miss me with the racial boundaries, but I don't get this idea that socialism would eradicate distinct cultures. The Soviet Union, and to a lesser extent China, did a lot of things to protect and promote the various national cultures. The legalization of the Ukrainian language was accomplished under the Soviet Union, to name but one example. Within the limits of respecting collectivization of the means of production etc., I don't see why you couldn't go play at being Amish or whatever. Once you have global communism and global planned development, there would be no need for movements of peoples beyond tourism and natural emergencies.

Would argue that this was a sympathy tactic, instrumental and not intrinsic to Soviet thought (per se). The Soviets knew full well they could turn the minority populations, oppressed and 'Russified' under the old older, in favour of the new regime by giving them more respect and cultural autonomy. They ofc also needed to find some workable federation they could include post-revolutionary peoples into without autistically pretending they could 'Russify' the world or whatever.

Well its hard to parse intentions almost a century after the fact. However, on the topic of race, which I dismissed but whatever, here is an interesting tidbit about race in Red China: national minority nationalities have grown their share of the population by leaps and bounds under communism, thanks to exemptions from the one child policy.
Counts as a Han genocide I suppose.

Attached: techomulattoism.webm (640x360, 2.89M)

Zig Forums doesn't hate you, in fact they agree with you. NutSac or Fascism is pretty much what you're about.

who the fuck made that webm

Attached: white juche.mp4 (854x480, 9.85M)

stop being racist you retard

neither of those are opposed to the bourgeoisie or capitalism outside of petty moralizing about "they's degenerate"

pretty interesting, ty

pire