Then she can choose to either stay in the house or figure out other living arrangements. I can't imagine being able to love someone who wants to trap you in your house like rapunzel, and if you're not in love with someone, you shouldn't be married. What you're describing is a hypotheticak, very toxic and controlling relationship that a woman would be best off separating herself from.
If a wife wants to be a housewife and her husband treats her with respect, what's the issue?
State and Sex and LGBT
This basically, which is why feminism is pretty much a non-issue for socialists today (aside from rejecting reactionary ideology as stupid). Still, it is an example of something that would be relevant to the socialist cause, as opposed to something like using the correct pronouns or titles, or going apeshit whenever a woman accuses a man of sexual harassment on bogus charges or charges that are far in excess of what actually happened. The new feminism is either liberal feminism or a disease vector that was introduced to leftism to derail and distract.
(For what it's worth I consider the abortion issue to be one of those disease vectors, it was quite clearly intended for eugenicist reasons, and there is no reason why most women can't keep their cunts shut if they don't want babies. I don't think abortion should be illegal and if it is to be done it ought to be done right and be available cheaply, but if rape were eliminated and women have agency then what is the choice argument exactly? Women make their choice when they agree to fuck. The logic applied to the abortion issue only works when coercive pressure is applied to control population growth and determine which women, essentially, are allowed to reproduce. The behavior of many pro-choice activists often betrays this intention. Again, I don't believe legal abortion is a horrible sin, but I am under no delusion about why the issue is pushed, and why it is deliberately put at the forefront of modern feminism.)
Bingo.
go back to the regular Zig Forums
It's almost like countries can be less tolerant during certain time periods….
Also TaTu was a marketing gimmick. Both women say they are straight as far as I know . They weren't lovers. The whole group was put together by a man. They split up from the manager because he was 'too busy thinking up scandals'. One of them openly made homophobic comments about how she wouldn't accept a gay son, just in 2014-saying that God made men to be men. She seems more accepting of lesbians, oddly? It's possible her views have gotten more conservative over time with the country,though. She does pull the 'I have gay friends ,though' argument. The other member ,Lena, still performs for LGBT,and seems overall more supportive,accepting. They are both Christ-tards but one talks about God's love for everyone,so *shrugs*
I just don't think that accepting a band where two young conventionally attractive girls make out is the same as gay acceptance. Mainstream hetero society has always kind of had a flirting relationship with young conventionally attractive lesbians as titillating performance. Using TaTu as an example of Russian acceptance of homosexuality is kinda laughable, though I don't want to undermine the positive influence on gay young people the group may have had.