Trotsky question

It's so fucking annoying.

Big tent communities actually get post activity, but it's like the BO would literally prefer a mostly dead Marxist-Leninist board over a highly popular general socialist board.

Every day it seems like we get closer and closer to the former. It's already de facto against the rules to criticize countries if they happen to be hostile to NATO, regardless of who those countries might be. Then he used word filters to more or less force a good chunk of anarchists off this board. Now it's only a matter of time until Trots are banned on sight.

What a fucking idiot.

Every left-wing discussion board either becomes a regressively sectarian hug box, or is subsumed into the identity politics thought bubble until it becomes a mainstream liberal hug box.

I suppose that's true, but I feel like Zig Forums has enough hostility toward liberalism that we might be able to grow substantially without our discourse being sucked into the mainstream terminology.

Not like we'll ever find out because, again, BO is doing everything in his power to stifle the growth of this board.

Except in the case of Zig Forums this rise of sectarianism is 100% due to BO's spergout and it would in all likelihood not have happened with a capable and sane person on top.

I've got my sympathies for ⛏️rotskyists, but you're definitely right that lots of trots these days are just idpol retards. Liberals larping to piss off their parents I'd assume.

I'm heading pigeons whispering in the trees. They're saying "coup! coup!"

Splendid idea comrade, but how to put these noble pigeons' proposal into practice?
Basically the only way would be if we can get the Zig Forums admins to reassign the board like they did with Zig Forums, but i don't think they care enough to do that

Damned if I know. I'm just a faggot making a Bill Hicks joke.

He was a genious in a time where globalization wasnt a thing.

⛏️rotskyists are extremely sectarian, which cause a reactive accusation, and there is a reason for that.

From an objective standpoint, there is no difference between ☭Stalinism☭ and ⛏️rotskyism. If you check out the actual critisism of the former, ⛏️rotsky used a very strange idea as a fundamental, that the error of the USSR simply has an incorrect leadership. That fact causes ⛏️rotskyists everywhere to believe that only themselves and ⛏️rotsky himself are true comrades.

Thus, its' only distinctive feature is edge. It's not without merit, though. A ⛏️rotskyist fanboy student is less cringy than a pro-Soviet or pro-Chinese fanboy communist, and ⛏️rotsky's edge allows him to intercept leftist radicals; which eventually lets them to cause less damage to their optics if they decide to go into real politics.