Russia lost its reliability when it sold Afrin for Idlib and it proved Assad is a puppet on his own throne. As such the S.D.F. had no choice but to double down on US support. Besides do you think burgers really care for an anti-capitalist, self sustaining society free from the nation-state model? Of course not, they just want an observation post to look after Iran and Putin, since MaT in the desert is pretty much defunct. If anything it'll come down to negotiations between the SAA and S.D.F with the latter becoming a self governing force within the non-state solution that they've been wanting and Assad gets his stability.
Literally the weakest "sleeper cell" in the region. Rumors from the DMC and MMC claim that they know where the members are located but they're the lowest priority, beaten by Kiyham and ISIS reminants. And both of those were cleansed a few days ago so their days are numbered.
Anthony Roberts
...
Kevin Gomez
I think there shouldn't be over a dozen US military bases in Syria as they are a sovereign UN member state who has not approved our presence.
/thread
Austin Foster
Would it be any different if they weren't in the UN? What if they did approve, like South Korea does? This is normie shit. If you're gonna make a shitty, low-effort post, at least try to use some socialist rhetoric.
Parker Smith
Yes, the US is using over a dozen US military bases in Syria, but over a dozen US military bases in Syria is also using the US, and on occasion other actors in the conflict, to achieve its own revolutionary aims. It's the largest libertarian socialist revolution since 1936, and the most important revolution of our time.
>>>Zig Forums At least don't admit being a fucking puppet
Ethan Nelson
When the BO checks in, will they ban the OP? Find out on the next episode of Zig Forums! -anime OST starts playing-
Mason Reed
Then it would be up to South Koreans to ask us to leave. Also how many Koreans have the USA killed this year? What's your rationale for your statement beyond contrarianism?
Julian Taylor
They're not a puppet. They're being used by, and also using, a larger world power to further their revolutionary goals. A sensible strategy in a multipolar world
Liam Clark
If you've been following the DPRK thread you'd know that the US bases aren't exactly a happy arrangement. A "sovereign UN member state" can consent to an imperialist power building bases in their country, as South Korea does, but that does not make it any less of an imperialist act, and it does not make it acceptable. By your logic, if some puppet government recognised by the UN allowed the bases to be built, it would be all right, and at that point you're basically condoning imperialism.
