"private" vs "personal" property

I'm pretty sure private property always meant the means of production, since feudal times. The whole "Private property = your TV" shit is something modern liberals made up

Attached: d0baaada8c404b74d5e164dceffba6904f0f1e7941684d1fd6a89eea3278f408.jpg (255x206, 19.35K)

if i wear my shoes to work then those shoes are the people's capital. If I'm not efficient with the people's capital they are legally allowed to send me to the human optimization chambers

Probably because Proudhon was french, english can be weirder than french sometimes, especially common law. The difference is just linguistic.

semantics tbh
how do we differ say, a bike or computer from a corporation or organization? without using orthodox terminology
I think complexity distinguishes the two.
Personal property requires a direct, physical access, devoid of social and financial middle men or third parties

Private property has always meant means of production.
Its only in very recent history that people started calling their personal stuff "private".

Mostly just using lQ to trigger rightists.

It works every time.

Attached: 1432515499159.png (480x270, 193.13K)

Attached: 16143051_1331177803591852_2861945701213114581_n.jpg (352x352, 14.1K)

Is this a joke post? Or are you truly this fucking stupid?
Thats the entire point of Marxism!!!!! Marxism rejects private property, and instead demands public ownership of porperty! I seriously can not imagine the sort of quibbly mess that is inside your skull. I dont even think a maggot would eat the disgusting pile of shit between your ears.
Hooo. Hoo wow. Have you ever heard of KARL MARX!? Perhaps you may have read a little book called the Communist Manifesto?

The distinction exists out of necessity.

',:^)