Sure. You didn't get banned yet. I can also understand where BO is coming from, wanting to nip this shit in the bud before it becomes multiple R O..J A V A generals and shit.
So what does your dad have to say about The CIA running around The Y..P G headquarters?
You realize the USA sees you as a non-uniformed mercenary group that they can use for their military campaign right?
Also, realize you're probably poisoning all your land for generations to come by firing all those comped $60,000 TOW missiles everywhere.
vice.com
I'm not talking about myself.
I don't know, I haven't asked him yet. I'll bring everyone's replies to him later.
Also, it seems that you are acting like I support or even represent the over a dozen US military bases in Syria. I already clarified that I understand the viewpoint of both sides and respect them to a degree. All I care about is ending the board owner's excessively strict banning policy.
Cool bruh. Well if know any Syrian Kurds or Y-P–J supporters go show him that shit I linked to here:
>vice.com
I know it's hard to look at but that shit is no joke. All those airstrikes from the 30mm cannons and the TOW launchers and probably all those Turkish tanks the Y–P.J are blowing up are dumping tons of that poison across the local landscape.
That land is going to be USELESS now.
Do you get what I'm saying?
………………
THIS SHIT IS NO JOKE
wired.com
newsweek.com
are you implying TOW missiles are radioactive? They use a shaped charge, not depleted uranium.
Well I heard about soldiers in Iraq getting fucked up from TOW missiles but I could be wrong. It''s not even the radioactivity that's the issue. It's the heavy metal.
Are you in the military? Are you sure there's no penetrator? Either way the Warthog's are still spraying it.
==The Pentagon said it wouldn’t use depleted uranium rounds against ISIS. Months later, it did — thousands of times. =
The Turkish tanks may or may not have it in their armor.
Are you an expert in these things? Fill me in if I'm talking out my ass.
Which tanks used in Syria do and don't have DU armor?
jeez, you're a real cunt. No, there is no penetrator. you can see in the patent diagram you posted there shaped charge with a stand-off crush detonator. they aren't kinetic energy weapons. it wouldn't even make sense since they only fly at 300 m/s
How am I a cunt? Am I disparraging the good name of the US and British Millitaries?
Ok wow you corrected me on a single point yet didn't disprove my point that they are still being sprayed there in airstrikes.
Also you didn't answer my question about the armor because every time one of the tanks with the DU armor(and other heavy metals) is blown up the effects are the same or potentially worse.
You're the real uninformed cunt if you think DEPLETED uranium is about the radioactivity and not the heavy metal poisoning.
Are you going to vouch that the missiles with the shaped charges don't have toxic heavy metals in them?
Are you going to vouch that the tank they were fired at wasn't full of DU rounds and covered with DU armor?
BTW what are you in the British Army, Navy, Airforce?
Some interesting reading (from the military I assume?)
e2s2.ndia.org
From page 49 about your perfectly harmless non uranium shaped charges:
IED and shaped charge munitions are hard to defeat.
Personnel exposures are also hard to quantify.
Toxicology
•
Exposure routes
–
Inhalation probably most common and most
significant, depending on scenario.
–
Skin and other direct exposures common.
–
Ingestion possible.
•
Adsorption, absorption, distribution, biotransformation,
excretion, toxicokinetics of toxicants may be complex.
•
Exposure
–
Route and site; duration and frequency.
–
Chronic vs acute; immediate vs delayed; reversible vs
irreversible toxic effects; potency vs efficacy.