What is a "liberal" in your mind and why do you hate them?

This is word salad to me. I am coming to this honestly and I'm not getting clarity.

It's basically what these anons have said

Okay, since you're having trouble I'll try to explain.
Liberalism is a belief system first arising during the 18 and 19th centuries. It promised freedom, liberty, equality, and all that jazz. Cool, right? Thing is, it didn't deliver on those promises. We disparage liberals because they're under the delusion that all those things have been accomplished, and that we need to stop being so "radical". Communists want the things Liberalism promised but never delivered on.
This is probably as simple and reduced this is going to get.

I've only recently encountered this use. It happens to be in a space where these people who've gotten "very comfortable using the language they read and then the language they use to discuss those ideas with others" are interacting with people who are not involved in their scenes and are not familiar with the implications you're saying are attached. But I've noticed they tend to feel free leaking this esoterism into these other areas while assuming it should be understood. I don't sense that it's a good faith usage based on their insular cultural usage where the definitions are more understood than outside their culture.


Since we're on good faith, i mentioned noticing this in a more mixed space where those freely and readily using the lingo could assume other readers wouldn't be familiar with this "well-read" definition of the phrase. And I have to point out that the casual usage of the term 'liberal' by American Democrat Cops of America and other various online 'leftist types' can only come across as a kind of bull-baiting, where the leftist derogatory user of the phrase "liberal" dares other "less read" people to demand a differentiation from the common perception and meaning of the term, whereupon they will be enabled to engage in sophistry or intellectual showmanship.

Due to your lack of knowledge oversimplification can lead to misunderstanding. (No offense)

I will try to explain.
Every sociopolitical system has an overarching ideology produced by its very existence, to justify itself.
For example in slave societies the ruling ideology held that slave/master relation was natural due to human nature/religious beliefs and thus citizens were justified to own them.
In capitalism, private property relations are held as basic human rights and the basis of morality, freedom and equality.

It's generaly used about leftists/centrists who think the implementation of the capitalist system is the problem and not the system itself, and so they promote policies to reform capitalism rather than replace it.

Whoa there! Don't associate democracy with liberalism. Liberals don't give a shit about democracy.. only that it works in their favorite TV character's favor. Dialectical synthesis is impossible without the democratic tradition. The lost causes of strongmen almost invariably lead to toxic evolutionism, and regression back to capitalist characteristics. That's because it's just one side that won over another and a waiting game until they influence and reaffirm capitalism. You gotta negate the negation through synthesizing the contradiction of classes. This happens with the least amount of deviancies through a government run by and for the proletariat. Democratic communism is the perfect blend, and only pure democracy.

Honestly, that kind of thing is an issue with the internet in general. People can, easier than ever, find hundreds of people who can discuss things on the exact level that they're at that they forget there's actually the need to explain things in a way that other people get. It's going to take time for people to balance out and remember that talking to regular people isn't like talking to StalinForPres2020 on an imageboard. Just look at all the people out there who have forgotten that shitposting isn't actually socially acceptable in most of the world, here's hoping that little phase ends soon.

Read Mao

'Combat Liberalism'

Attached: FB_IMG_1532904782422.jpg (720x960, 105.24K)

So liberal = capitalist = defenders of private property. And therefore (somewhere in that discursion) "liberals" are "capitalists" are "defenders of private property" and are thus evil?