In the whole fuck fest that was the fall of yugoslavia, was he /ourguy/?

Fucking this. Jesus Christ.

Attached: 1529083209840.jpg (480x451, 26.58K)

Not a trot, but the guy did have some good theory. The Brazil quote is quite relevant to the Yugoslavia situation. Milosevic was a miserable nationalist porky and not /ourguy/ at all but Yugoslavia deserved thoughts and prayers critical support in the struggle against NATO.

LOL that faggot…serbs sucked ass…came in with tanks and weapons and whole fucking JNA army while Croats had nothing but hunting rifles and managed to lost and run away on stolen tractors…that was worst than USA loosing to vietnamese farmers

Fuck off you tribal nationalist apologist. NATO doesn't give a shit about human rights, but that doesn't mean that the Yugoslav wars weren't all kinds of fucked up.

of course it was fucked up. Serbia owned everything and all of a sudden they couldn't even hold power over Montenegro kek

...

Very true, which is why I argue for Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi to be recognized as the largest revolutionary figure within contemporary socialism for his struggles against U.S. imperialism in the Middle East! I also think it's great optics and good for the cause to associate ourselves with him and other theocratic opportunists that everyone else hates.
After all, not doing so would mean supporting imperialism!

Attached: bakr.jpg (259x194, 7.58K)

¡FUERAS SLOBABOOS, IZETBEGOVICISTAS, TUDMANISTAS Y CLINTONISTAS!

What's the reason of speaking spanish now?

Name one thing he did wrong

read

He was bombed by murrica. Which means he must have been doing something right.

Banking.

'Critically supporting' (which too often becomes uncritically supporting) everyone and their mother that the U.S. bombs is just going to make us look like crackpots. It's fucking awful praxis. Socialism doesn't win by simply weakening one imperialist country or another. It wins by winning hearts and minds in the strongest, most developed countries. That's when we can really get shit done.

Until then, optics is key.

lmao serbs went full imperialist when the war started, keep on sucking dicks of ultra-nationalist warmongers

t. croat

ČUVATJE SE UŠTASE I TURCI

Attached: 389af525477a27fd74eff650c1c96083a419eaa1542138de485e1bf4e0db8696.png (621x422 59.92 KB, 76.74K)

Wrong image

Attached: croat leader ss-1.jpeg (318x499, 38.49K)

I was born in 1993 in rump Yugoslavia so I can't say I know all but I picked up something while I researched some stuff about 90's.

From my shitty opinion:
Milosevic wanted to be new Tito like figure.
But he couldn't sustain Tito's Yugoslavia, only thing he could do to gain power is to use Serbian nationalism for his goals.
FR Yugoslavia was new country formed in 1992, from remaining two states in Yugoslavia: Serbia and Montenegro.

Plan was to expand that new Yugoslavia with new territories that would be Serb republic in Bosnia and Serbian Krajina in Croatia.

But he didn't have all power, he had to make coalitions with nationalist parties like SRS led by Vojislav Seselj.

He wasn't against minorities and other nationalities like Croats and Bosniaks.

I remember I read somewhere that in some meeting there was discussion about some Muslim being government official in Budapest or something like that, but him being Muslim was problem for some who didn't want him on that position, Milosevic said something like: He is citizen of FR Yugoslavia.
Meaning that it does not matter that he is Muslim and he should be treated like citizen.

I remember that my school still had name of some communist child hero, which after fall of Milosevic got renamed to Serbian leader of 1804 uprising.
And it wasn't only case of such renaming.
There was one surviving chetnik from WW2 from around my town, who only returned to his village where he was born after Milosevic's fall.
I remember seeing another older man wearing beard and chetnik uniform also after fall of Milosevic.

Stuff like that wouldn't probably happen during his rule.

Again, don't use this as any evidence, it's just some personal observation.

P.S.
Albanians were retards, they were creating troubles even when Tito was alive and especially after his death.

Also something I forgot to add.
Country's name: Federal Republic of Yugoslavia; had just socialist removed from name.
Milosevic's party was socialist party.
National flag was same flag of Tito's Yugoslavia, just with red star removed.
National anthem was Yugoslavian anthem.
Official language was still Serbo-Croatian until 1997, same language in Tito's Yugoslavia.

Everything reeked of old Yugoslavia and many nationalists didn't like it.

Only American communists seem to admire Slobo.

Not true. Plenty in my country, that's why I asked here

🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧Tuđman🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

Attached: 2393F748-3530-4689-9480-31CDCFFAA92E.jpeg (417x353, 22.01K)

the perennial "sloba was a nice man" thread really makes it easy to delete this lunatic board from my bookmarks

bye fuckface

t. butthurt bosniak

is there a blood-drenched nationalist monster you won't meet with open arms as long as they're sufficiently anti-USA?
can't wait for the socialist future the likes of you will be creating, socialism with genocidal characteristics

Again, what genocide are we talking about? Srebreinca isn't a genocide

Srebrenica was isolated incident.
There was no definite goal of exterminating Bosniak population, actual example of genocide is Rwandan genocide.

If Serbs wanted to exterminate Bosniak people they would not wait until 1995.

He's nationalist swine. Too bad they didn't kill him in 1987

Which country?

Milosevic was a nationalist but not a fascist, NATO would've supported him if he was a fascist

lol, literally playing wordgames to avoid the G-word
you can make as many mass graves as you want as long as it's TECHNICALLY not a genocide

...

It wasn't genocide and even if it was in this case it was totally justified you islamocuck

The usa supported hitler you dumb american

You reactionaries are disgusting trash

Well this was a pretty retarded thing to say
For the Balkans to function properly again we need to stop sucking off any side in the war
That mostly includes jailing every single politician that was in power during that time (and still is), but for some reason Croats and Bosnians still stick to their guns with Croats celebrating their fascists and the anniversary when they butchered/banished Serbian civilians.
And Bosnians still claiming that the war was one sided with Evil Serbs butchering women and children.
This area of the world will never fucking change while one generation still poisons the next one.

America was the biggest influence on Hitler's worldview

No word games here.
Srebrenica was not genocide.

Serbs in Bosnia wouldn't wait for 3 years to start cleansing Bosnia of Muslims/Bosniaks.
Serb militia was in much better position to do it before 1995.

Genocide doesn't happen in one single town with several thousand casualties, there was no planned extermination of Bosniaks, only their subduing under Serbian power.

If there was such plan, Srebrenica would be just one case of many such killings.

...

Attached: 36254.png (640x405, 505.96K)

I'm pretty sure syria got stiked lots more in these 3 years