Is this a psyop?

To what extent is stuff like pic related influencing and validating the rise of the far right?
What is scary about this shit is that is basically all american media. Most of the buzz of the day videos on Zig Forums are also funded by American or filoamerican organization.
Are Americans try to make the world fascist?
While this board does recognize the role of liberalism in all this shit, I don't think it goes far enough.
Imho stuff like this is allowed and had an agenda: Not an anti.white agenda, but a massive psyop to invalidate leftism.

I can't be the only one to notice this. Articles like this are all the ammo the right needs.
Is Porky basically creating a "fail safe" army?

Attached: hykonsN.jpg (971x1728 73.28 KB, 176.52K)

Other urls found in this thread:

thephilosophicalsalon.com/the-cia-reads-french-theory-on-the-intellectual-labor-of-dismantling-the-cultural-left/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

That’s 99% of what Zig Forumsyps hate is this idpol shit, causing them to idpol back twice as hard. It’s the capitalist class dividing us as usual

It's not just psyop, but also an acceptable form of controversy. Controversy brings more views, which brings more ad revenue. You know that Chomsky quote about lively debate within a narrow acceptable spectrum.

it's a pendulum that swings back and forth. these people are doomed until they become materialists and recognize class struggle

Attached: 1493690643026.png (1202x1001, 516.59K)

Tbh this point I'm almost convinced American intersectional liberalism is a psyop aimed to purposefully radicalize the reactionary element. Does this make me a tinfoil hatter?

That's what I was trying to say with op too, so at least you are not alone

I remember seeing something on 4chan a long time ago about the government being involved with SRS. Does anyone have the post?

No. Sounds reasonable.

Attached: 1494344459460.webm (640x360, 3.21M)

Sort of. Americans are unusual in that instead of the realities of class being hidden from them, they consciously choose to worship the bourgeoisie. This is mostly driven by Protestantism and its influence on US culture.

It's just too perfect for them not to have come up with it. In one fell swoop you declaw leftism, forevermore make a strawman of any ethnic/sexual liberation group with revolutionary potential, and create an army of fascist shock troopers. You then use the latter to push for more surveillance and censorship measures.

Attached: 895c7d892725e52a962a1de08a44a8d79b0cb6d61ae16b7de2b0762ffde07fd9.png (1000x600, 271.58K)

>not thephilosophicalsalon.com/the-cia-reads-french-theory-on-the-intellectual-labor-of-dismantling-the-cultural-left/
That picture is kinda garbage, especially in its condemnation of Marcuse' work - the article posted is a much better, academic account of the CIA use of theory to fight contemporary Marxism

It's the creation of Engels, Marx's sugar daddy and the George Soros-figure of the time.

So, why we don't drop them?

Drop who? Marcuse? Or the people the article mentions? The former is relatively innocuous and did good work in the 30s and the latter is pretty substantively delineated in the article between salvageable and leftist (Lacan, Althusser, etc.) and the other

"Firstly, it is not true that fascism is only the fighting organisation of the bourgeoisie. Fascism is not only a military-technical category. Fascism is the bourgeoisie’s fighting organisation that relies on the active support of Social-Democracy. Social-Democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism. There is no ground for assuming that the fighting organisation of the bourgeoisie can achieve decisive successes in battles, or in governing the country, without the active support of Social-Democracy. There is just as little ground for thinking that Social-Democracy can achieve decisive successes in battles, or in governing the country, without the active support of the fighting organisation of the bourgeoisie. These organisations do not negate, but supplement each other. They are not antipodes, they are twins. Fascism is an informal political bloc of these two chief organisations; a bloc, which arose in the circumstances of the post-war crisis of imperialism, and which is intended for combating the proletarian revolution. The bourgeoisie cannot retain power without such a bloc. It would therefore be a mistake to think that “pacifism” signifies the liquidation of fascism. In the present situation, “pacifism” is the strengthening of fascism with its moderate, Social-Democratic wing pushed into the forefront."
- Stalin

...

All lib idpol is a psyop.

imagine my surprise

leftism does that on its own unless it is based in nature, like NutSac.

You need to think of identity politics in terms of capitalism and not in terms of emotional attachment to those who you perceive to be victims of society. It is fruitless to become emotionally attached to minorities getting fucked by capitalism because we are all getting fucked. It is like concentrating on those who are on one end of the boat when the whole fucking boat is sinking. Identity politics serves many purposes, only one of which is to distract us from remembering that the ship of fools is sinking.

As for the capitalist reasoning it is simply economical to shift markets from whites to other 'up and coming' groups. The value of whites has been fully extracted. This is a group which is debt saturated and enslaved fully. They have all legally available lines of credit obtained and maxxed. They have taken out big fucking mortgages on mcmansions they can't afford and they have enslaved their children into indentured servitude to service debt from useless degrees that further distract them from economic reality and enforce the distraction of concentrating on perceived victims. The old boomer whites will get reverse mortgages to service their in home care and care home lifestyle they will have after the dick hardening and artery declogging drugs take their inevitable toll. This is a group which has nothing left to be taken.

It is just a simple matter of business. Articles like this are about the elites telling the whites to move the fuck over so Mexicans and Blacks can get fucked by the banks too. It is like moving to the next cow in a line of cows being milked, you can continue to suck one cow until there is barely anything left but it is more economical to just fucking swap the cow out for the next to milk. Oh and don't get me started on immigration. You think American Democrat neoliberals give a single fuck about Juan from Honduras getting separated from his mother? Fucking christ no, it is about the creation of a new underclass capable of becoming debt saturated as well with less rights and a weaker historical understanding of how America grinds groups of people and shits them out.

Attached: 1530549064751.jpg (502x1024, 123.9K)

This is a bit fucking different tho, don't you think?
They write some straight up awful shit in those article.

the article only exists to justify the headline

But it's not possible to deny the influence these articles have on the recent rising of right wing politics. You think that's a coincidence

Attached: 1343628249466.png (850x400 117.86 KB, 89.28K)

Destroying capitalism is the only way to protect us from PoC.

idiotic slaves to advertising algorithms.
not a coincidence, an emergent property

Attached: DOCpZGKUEAAB8oc.jpg (777x767, 110.19K)