Was he really a postmodernist, or was he a dialectical materialist or a structuralist? I know his books have some surreal satire, but most of it is actually a reference to real historical events, secret operations, and socioeconomic systems. His books are full of things that are "unknown" to the characters, but actually knowable to the reader if they do enough research. In contrast, postmodernism, like all idealism, posits that things are unknowable. Similarly, you get the sense of "relative truths" but not absolute relativism in his books.
So why is he called a postmodernist? Does he actually outright say it somewhere?
Pynchon
Hudson Lee
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
twitter.com
Isaac Roberts
Due to The Crying of Lot 49? It ends on the "unknowable".
Adam Hill
Reminder that Thomas Pynchon was an antifascist counterespionage revolutionary using literature as his cover to infiltrate and expose fascist networks.
twitter.com
Evan Sanchez
Even if he was a fascist he'd still be a good writer. So post like yours are irrelevant
Ryder Allen
How is Crying about the "unknowable" when it's about a secret network run by human beings (who obviously must know it)?
Daniel Campbell
Why are you talking about him in the last tense when he’s still alive and published another book last year?
Jordan Murphy
Pynchon isn't really a postmodernist he's just a really cynical Lefty who fell for the "bro the soviet union is just state capitalism xDDDD" meme that a lot of hippie anarchists spouted at the time and never really recovered
Charles Parker
It ends on the moment of revelation. What and whether there is any sort of secret network in actuality remains unclear insofar as the text is concerned. It's been a number of years since I've read it, so I could be wrong.
Dominic Gonzalez
Lazy academics.
Sorta this. He's a conservative anarchist.
Kevin Martinez
I think he's seen as a "postmodernist" more as a kind of literary genre or style, not in regards to the beliefs he happens to hold.