Which way?

David Duke makes an interesting point, will the modern left completely disavow IdPol or will we allow it to consume our movement?
IdPol is winning
The only prominent Marxist who speaks out against it is Jason Unruhe

Attached: 06EFA415-830D-4E51-9A2E-C5C75F4D07E9.jpeg (750x634, 129.79K)

Majority of internet leftwingers are against idpol. The most prominent one, Shaun doesen't even make any content about it, he just debunks rightwinger lies.

Picture on the left has been making rounds I see, what's even the story behind it?

But at the same time they are really not
Stop right there with dicksucking that liberal idiot. That fucker would literally justify merkel or anyother neoliberal monster if it means "le righitist fucking owned"

Guess what? Left picture in op is really that. Nothing else. Contrarianism and senseless self serving taste for destruction. All for what? Trigger a couple of boomers? That's not what I want to do when I say I'm a communist. I'm tired of you glorified liberals who see in triggering rightards the only reason to be left wing or to exist

Attached: thiefcrit6.jpg (739x416, 92.13K)

Why the fuck are all modern US NeoNazis dumb fucking NazBols now who misunderstand what the USSR was?

Why the fuck are all modern US Marxist dumb fucking liberals now who misunderstand what the USSR was?

Can't deny that there was a social conserv.ative component. Can't deny that it did good

Attached: brainless wojak.png (645x729, 68.74K)

Compared to 90% of its contemporaries no it wasn't
Asides the NazBol bullshit has nothing to do with it being "actually reactionary"
It's all about these peoples delusion that the USSR was a white ethno state

I don't what the image in op is trying to say is pro enthno nationalism.

Bitch what? Michael Parenti ring a bell?

Where did they say it was reactionary? They said it was actually reactionary in many areas which is not the same thing as reactionary.

Does he not? Did you read anything else OP said?

Attached: сталина на вас нет.jpg (468x547, 68.28K)

Oh… so s ocially c onservative is automatically converted to reactionary on this board… my apologies, I wasn't aware of this faggotry.

Word filter
Social conser.vative
Goes to
Social conservative

It's hit or miss

pick 1 you stupid nigger

no he does not because caring about muh tradwife conservatism and family values is also idpol

Fascists do not have an example of actually successful, inspirational fascism. They can't openly praise Nazi Germany and every other fascist project in history has been unpopular, created no achievements and ended in abject failure. So they turn to brown-washing socialist countries to prove their ideology works, implying on the sly that Stalin was a nazbol, national liberation movements all over the world are ethnonationalist, DPRK is fascist etc. It's really fucking pathetic.

Name three leftist youtubers who make idpol content.

Let me know when that happens, until then talk is cheap.

Attached: Leftistm.jpg (1836x1780, 447.4K)

You pick one. There are self proclaimed marxist who are liberals. Just go to twitter and see. Or on this fucking board at times

Nice misrepresentation of the point being made.

David duke is literally an Ethno-Nationalist who wants Le pure white ethnostate
If you get anything else from shit like this except that he apparently believes that the USSR was a Russian Ethnostate then your hopeless

...

the point quote-unquote that Duke was trying to make is that liberal feminist sjwism is de.generate idpol but faux-traditionalist family values nazbol politics aren't. this is retarded because traditionalism is white idpol and just as reactionary if not more so

Add

tubusshow, ПОБЕДИТЕЛЬ, Вестник Бури, TheRedUniversity, Ледокол, Мы из СССР!

They're all leftwing socialist channels, 0 idpol

first of all, op, you're a fucking retard. If you think David Duke is approaching commies in good faith with this question, you are hopelessly retarded. People like Duke believe both of these pictures are "jewish subversion." To nazis like Duke, Judaism and Communism are basically the same thing.
Also, lefty/pol/'s obsession with being "anti-idpol" is completely bankrupt and anti-Marxist. Besides, even if Marx had some backward views regarding POC, "Asiatic society," etc., he was wrong then and is still wrong. Marxism isn't about pulling quotes from Marx and Engels and treating them as infallible law, although Marxist-Leninists seem to think so. Marxism is a method and analytical tool, and that is why it's still relevant and useful.

Attached: well there's an informed opinion.gif (500x271, 1.8M)

Looks like anarchists.

Was the USSR fucking nazbol now?

I didn't know. i still don't get what's ethno nationalist about that picture tho. Nor nazbol or traditionalist. The photos of the ussr show people like that. Literally nothing bad in that. Left pic on the contrary looks like america

Like when they claimed Sankara was a Black Nazi because he nationalised French stuff and didn't like colonialism ?

USSR did have reactionary elements
It practiced imperialism and a form of Settler-colonialism (sending Ethnic Russians/Germans/Ukrainians to colonize in mass Kazakhstan, the Caucasus region, Siberia etc)

North Korea is a defacto Korean ethnostate

Lmao

Lmao

Settlers tard are worse than fucking dengist.
Back to neogaf you massive piece of shit and thanks for proving that I'm right

Yeah, exactly.