Weakness

Why does the mainstream left celebrate weakness for its own sake? Why is any display of strength over the enemy (fascists/landlords/kulaks) considered a fundamental betrayal of "leftism"?
Why the constant virtue signalling over lifestyleist "purity"?

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-09-08 at 4.34.07 am.png (263x350 270.6 KB, 26.82K)

Other urls found in this thread:

cnbc.com/2018/09/07/air-force-is-looking-into-elon-musks-pot-smoking-source.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

lol

why you lyin' tho?

Because strenght is reactionary, white cis male pig

Except for not eating meat Anti-Anglo is right about everything else being a vice.

Attached: calm.png (871x900, 210.43K)

In the event of any successful revolution or event when the enemy is either arrested/killed, most of the mainstream left will be the first to disavow the extreme violence, to shake their heads disapprovingly at the reality of class struggle

Your rad-lib is showing twitter.

@HoxhaistQ
Account created: July 2018
Following: 4,939
Followers 699
Likes: 5,356

hmmm….. >_>

o fuk i do coffee and alcohols im not a coummnalist anymo :'^)

to be sure I agree with Nietzsche. Read Tiqqun (file related). I'd almost go as far as to say I am not a leftist, but clearly I have more affinity with the (web) left than the (web) right. It's just that most rightists are retards and charlatans defending their power. Even Marx got over his moralism even if the social democratic movement was infused with it.

Faggot.

BDSM is for degenerates

>The contradictions in Tolstoy’s works, views, doctrines, in his school, are indeed glaring. On the one hand, we have the great artist, the genius who has not only drawn incomparable pictures of Russian life but has made first-class contributions to world literature. On the other hand we have the landlord obsessed with Christ. On the one hand, the remark ably powerful, forthright and sincere protest against social falsehood and hypocrisy; and on the other, the “Tolstoyan”, i.e., the jaded, hysterical sniveller called the Russian intellectual, who publicly beats his breast and wails: “I am a bad wicked man, but I am practising moral self-perfection; I don’t eat meat any more, I now eat rice cutlets.” On the one hand, merciless criticism of capitalist exploitation, exposure of government outrages, the farcical courts and the state administration, and unmasking of the profound contradictions between the growth of wealth and achievements of civilisation and the growth of poverty, degradation and misery among the working masses. On the other, the crackpot preaching of submission, “resist not evil” with violence. On the one hand, the most sober realism, the tearing away of all and sundry masks; on the other, the preaching of one of the most odious things on earth, namely, religion, the striving to replace officially appointed priests by priests who will serve from moral conviction, i. e., to cultivate the most refined and, therefore, particularly disgusting clericalism.
Amusing how sniveling rice cutlet eaters call themselves Marxist-Leninists today.

nice spook

Attached: images.jpg (193x261, 5.49K)

Poisoning your body
Makes you sound stupid

>keep your behavior in line with my morals at all time

faggot can't be serious
i thought this is the cool kids commie club, not the catholic church

Attached: what is this fun.PNG (672x461, 126.16K)

Masturbating, casual sex, SOME drugs, and swearing are ok. The rest of those are legitimately vices and should not be supported by any communist. Simple as.

How about fuck off.

YOU ARE NOT COMING ANYWHERE NEAR MY BURGERS

Attached: 12435.png (601x601, 357.37K)

Why don't you write up a comprehensive list of all the immoral things people won't be allowed to do in your communist society and shove is straight up your authoritarian asshole

He didn't say he was an anarchist, jackass. Miss me with your persecution complex.

Why are we even speaking of "vices"? Should we divide the sins into venial and mortal? It's no wonder we have idiots like that one Christian "communist" here being attracted to a left milieu. The moral haranguing is virtually the same.

pardon me, but there's no need to pull the "authoritarian" card
"authoritarian state socialism" had better sex, better alcohol culture, great quality meat production and swearing has always been popular, you just do it with friends, not in public
we have weed as nothing special people just smoke in the DPRK
obviously they also had healthier relationships between women and men, so no need to just go fuck around and whore themself
but that kind of shit pretty much sorts itself out
best socialism can do is create a society that discourages any "bad" shit, not by law, but simply providing better, healthier conditions

no point chastising ourself for being broken pieces of shit under capitalism though, that's fucking retarded

100% right, and everything you said about eastern bloc

Eh this kind of sounds like what local incels like to say, "marxism means there is no personal responsibility, every personal criticism is muh bootstraps". The revolutionary should self-crit and hold himself to some moral standard, not because of spooked reasons but because shooting krokodil into your eyeballs while humping a fursuit doesn't make for good praxis. Even Lenin wrote about this

thats not chastising though
i mean i wouldnt go to a prostitute or do drugs, but it's not something i'd drop someone over as a (potential) comrade, that's just ridiculous

and by the arbitrary other standards that bitch in OPs post condemned everyone who ever participated in a socialist revolution, including Marx and Lenin

cnbc.com/2018/09/07/air-force-is-looking-into-elon-musks-pot-smoking-source.html

Attached: mfw13.gif (800x430, 897.09K)