Fags

Why do most Western leftists support fags?

Fags are fighting for the equal rights they already have. LGBT is a political organization endorsed by libs like Trudeau and Clinton, so people like you are distracted from class struggle

They want to establish gay privilege with "same-sex marriage" (marriage has always been straight & for raising kids, gay marriage is unneeded). It is just like Engels predicted - fags got in power and started putting them above others

Still want to support fags and tranners?

Attached: fgt.jpg (400x300, 25.45K)

anti-sjw idpol is still idpol

Why do most Western leftists support Niggers?

They want to establish Nigger privilege with "equal rights" (equal rights has always been white & for raising the race up, nigger rights is unneeded). It is just like Engels predicted - niggers got in power and started putting them above others

Still want to support Niggers?

you mean anti-gay idpol is still idpol

being gay or being black is different from being an SJW

Anti Anti-SJW idpol is still idpol, comrade.

Except….They literally dont in the majority of countries?
/gulag/

All LGBT organizations hold the same liberal views

stop lying to me

it is breaking my heart

Attached: IRPGF2-pic905-895x505-71154.jpg (895x504, 124.69K)

Even so its still worthy to support them (As long as their not full on "Rainbow McDonalds snapchat filter" tier or some shit)
Because they progress society away from being controlled by the ideals of decades ago and help end the spooking of society by christ / Islam cucks

except Democrats did not support gay marriage until after it was ruled by a judge
Clinton even spoke out against it

personally i'm against recognizing retarded people, the mentally disabled, as "humans"
these things, like OP, shouldn't have any legal rights, they are a mere drain on society and can be tolerated at best, if they don't abuse their privilege of being let to live by trying to pretend that they have the right to opinions on matters they clearly have no grasp on
i doubt any true revolutionary socialist can deny that these dysfunctional things like OP shouldn't be just put down to be disposed of in a trash can and thrown into a dump

Attached: 291767123.PNG (586x489, 131.94K)

Just proves anarchism is liberal-endorsing cancer

Normalizing genetic disorders, paraphilias or straight up retardation is not progress. Why give a fuck about fags and 1488 genders when capitalism exists?

Even if you go by the theory of Homosexuality being a Genetic disorder that simply means it literally cant be trained out of these people (Which is what christian fundamentalists have been claiming for decades) and youve got no real way of dealing with them besides

A. Just minding your buisness and not giving a shit like anyone whose not entirely insecure
B. Killing all of them

I choose A because literally who even cares asides from Boomers in their 60s and Zig Forums at this point?

Forced marriages affected many women in Russia. Fags are a minority & explicitly liberal and/or reformist

It's almost as if capitalism isn't the only issue on the face of the earth and we have social problems that existed before it?

If a Homosexual / Lesbian Individual is working class then they are part of the Proletarian class and thus will have their economic exploitation ended under a DoP like everyone else in the proletarian class and will be allowed to live their lives not constrained by the beliefs of the Church and the Reactionary goverment

No we don't? Sexism (including sexism against men), racism and climate change are part of capitalism

socialism isn't possible without first gassing the kikes prove me wrong /leftycuck/

Then why do those fags dgaf about class struggle and only about Pride. They are chauvinist class enemies

I think we should handle them the Stalin way - 8 years in reeducation camp

...

Cuba is literally fucking switching to capitalism because of fags

A. Cuba isnt "switching to capitalism" it is simply recognizing the already existing situation
B. What does Cuba's choice to Legalize Homosexuality and its Recognition of Material Conditions have to do with each other asides from being in the same draft of the constitution

Same-sex marriage is gay chauvinism. Read some letters by Engels

No
its literally just having the right to do something that the rest of the population can already do
Obviously Engels Social Views are backwards and illogical in the modern world (Much like Marx's takes on race)

We respect Marx and Engels for their contributions and economic science not for their personal views

Marriage is a union needed to raise children. It has always been that. Gay marriage is an imitation

Attached: pea brain.png (645x968, 94.31K)

please explain why you think this

lol holy shit imagine being this aversed to professional studies and obvious knowledge

The LGBT movement is liberal & faggotry is wrong and anti-Marxist

Nowhere in the Human biology does it say that Humans need to perform a marriage ceremony in the Christian rite to raise children

Marriage in the west in the modern context serves only as a Legal status a Celebration and a Rite of passage for observant christ cucks

why do you need so much black propaganda from this board? i don't get it

how?

Casual sex is not Marxist. Socialism values family and fertility

...

You can support women's rights and value family. Child raising is important

Yeah you see…You CAN but that dosent disprove what ive said / typed

Also just because you allow Homosexuals to get married wont magically sterilize all heterosexual people so they stop having kids

If gay marriage is legalized, people would start treating it as normal

So?
If what you've previously said about Homosexuality being Genetic is true then it wont magically make people "convert" to Homosexuality

Do you believe that gay people have exclusively casual sex and never have families or relationships?

I'm gay and there's NOTHING you can do about it OP

Attached: cFjsvJt.png (639x425, 266.08K)

Fag families are terrible and harmful. I don't mind fag relationships as long as they're kept private

are they?

Yeah but thats Literally just your personal Anecdotal opinion

In my socialist group, the actual Marxist-Leninists are disproportionately gay dudes compared to most of the socdem rank-and-file.

SUCK

MY

DICK

Attached: PjhRzyq.png (1013x812, 223.42K)

You say that, yet you guys STILL support the idpol.

Attached: 1dcc90fa90329e336bd64a85526feda99438df8fd085d936a5e855ff566f9b62.png (625x605, 51.19K)

That must be why Gays can naturally produce children, they're clearly made for families.

No it isn't.
That's like saying

Attached: shutup_heterosexual.png (497x767, 633.5K)

autism

Yes, I do. I do what I want.

Why you focusing on complaining about gay people instead of focusing on class struggle?

My sexuality is my property and I shall do what I will with it as I please. Now back away slowly, nobody has to die here.

Attached: 1518043860007.png (523x452, 117.63K)

That's comical.


Satanism is bourgeois.

Attached: 200px-Crowley_unicursal_hexagram.svg.png (200x220, 5.28K)

I think about state recognized marriage, and i dont see a purpose for it under socialism. It seems to me to only exist for property inheritance and a way to ensure family members have security in the form of health/life insurance and other securities. Removing these legal functions of marriage then we are left with only a spiritual one. I dont mind people doing whatever, but why should the state be involved in this sort of thing?

(OP)

All the weirdos are holding us back. They can have their own 'movements' but they should be told to stay the he'll away from the left. Being a degenerate isn't being leftist, as each degenerate has his or her own personal politics as human beings. There are homos at every point in the political spectrum and therefore their affliction should not be treated as needing a liberal or leftist remedy and instead they should be treated as the contemptible degenerates they truly are.

agreed

based samefag

...

And what happened to all these states? Thank them fags

correlation is not causation

W E W
what a boiling hot take
No gays didnt cause the collapse of thee USSR
The Capitalist Infiltrators that took power in 1991 were openly Anti-LGBT and collaborated with the church to throw russian society back almost an entire century

They were so anti-LGBT that they legalized faggotry in 1993

Fags demanded "freedom" and contributed to Perestroika

yeah just ignore the actually existing De-Facto state of oppression against them
A. Generalization
B. Citation needed

You provide no evidence for anything you say but expect me to take you seriously

false equivalence
the only way to be anti-idpol is to reject ALL identity politics, obviously. that includes both mainstream pro-lgbt identity politics and trad retard identity politics that are just the former turned on its head.
thinking that gays should have preferential treatment because of their gay identity is idpol. thinking they should be expelled from the movement and persecuted instead is also idpol

I've not seen homosexuals protesting for the right to marry in my country since they got it in 2001.
There are people on the pride parade who are slightly disgruntled that someone got beaten into the hospital for being transgender.

LGBT is not a political orginisation just like antifa isnt one.

Read some Engels. Marriage is for property relations. Not for baby making. Nevertheless, theres tons of straight couples not having kids and plenty who are infertile. Should they be barred from marrying too since they dont need to?
Marriage as a legal concept on its own is pretty useless but while we have it theres no harm in letting gays get married too. Oh and OP, lesbians frequently have kids together with donated sperm and gay men adopt kids. So according to your logic they should be able to get married too.

I don't oppose them and I oppose beating trannies into the hospital. They're just people I dont give a fuck about their identity, you retarded idpol cuck.

gay adoption and IVF is gross and unnatural

that's not an argument mr. boomer

LUL

that's not an argument mr. boomer

Feels < Reals
Nature is not real. We are part of nature, everything that can happen is natural. Nature is an abrahamic concept we invented to differentiate ourselves from gods creation as a higher master. On that note, by the definition nature everything humans do is unnatural.

Lesbians dont do ivf, you just squit the cum in their cunt. IVF is for couples who have trouble conceiving in the regular manner, who are 99+% straight.


Not an argument

Attached: stirner looking up from a corner.png (77x77, 9.99K)

Read some Engels
Pederasts are taking over governments

This thread is based on false assumptions and lies. Why hasn't it been bump-locked and OP banned?

Attached: 422`1212112.png (600x600, 209.64K)

In general leftists hold libertarian-liberal social views, because they focus on economics first, since gays are only less than one percent of population, it is not that relevant to focus on.

It must be noted that the only thing Engels ever definitively said on the topic is basically calling some people faggots in a shitposty private letter to Marx

...

Some people on leftypol are aware of the homo/trans problem, and it's origins as a bourgeois perversion, they are just keep it secret because mods generally always ban for even discussing or interrogating the subject from a marxist perspective, branding anyone who does as a reactionary.

Gays themselves personally are degenerates, I don't wield this word like a nazi would mind you, I don't attack them for this I just view it as an unfortunate reality of the extent capitalism will go to break us. In the case of trans people the most, they are sincerely alienated and broken people, as is part and parcel with capitalism. This coping mechanism for them is creating a whole new persona, a new person, where they aren't depressed and alienated.

I'm not saying we should abandon them, their needs should be looked after just the same but it's important to fully analyse where it comes from and how it is created in the first place.

Attached: 1513927982002.png (1080x1400, 1.59M)

If homosexuals are "degenerate" or have their origins in "bourgeoisie perversion", why did they exist before capitalism?

This, comrade, I am, too, more to the Engels/Gorky side on sexual deviancy problem, but alas.

The only sensible policy is that the state should not bother with what people do in their beds. But LGBT is wholly on the whole other level, it it will backfire for all, themselves included.

Speaking of
American Left is extremely marginalized and possessed by bribes and influences of the ruling class, so American Leftism can be barely discussed as a movement. They are Neoliberals in disguise, so they do what they gotta do.

Fuck this reminds me of the old days
We just need afroplasm to pop up

Attached: images.png (194x260, 6.69K)

technically they didn't exist, you had your actives who generally didn't care what sex they were fucking, then you had your passives who often coded as a third gender
trying to shoehorn the modern concept of homosexuality back in time doesn't work all that well

...

>romans had traps before it was cool

That's why you leave it to the Liberals to do the legwork, that way we as Socialists can focus our energy on the Class Struggle, whilst getting retards who won't side with us when the time comes to do some of our work of despooking people for us?

Scratch that, I read the rest of the thread, this guy is just a reactionary, there's no reasoning with him even if you BTFO all his arguments because he's a retard

Historically, this isn't even true - there actually were same sex marriages in a few societies. And "read some Engels" guy was right that it's about property (particularly land) relations - though it also was a ritual for joining tribes and families. And in actual existing society, some gays raise kids and some straights don't. Nothing about your claim here is true.