What does Zig Forums think about brain size disparities in sex and race? Males have larger brains than females, and whites have larger brains than blacks, on average.
I was banned about a week ago for posting this on the basis of "Zig Forums baiting". I dont know how to make this topic less bait-like in nature, but I suspect the ban was more to do with silencing inconvenient truths than genuine moderation. I am curious to know your thoughts.
Other urls found in this thread:
m.youtube.com
twitter.com
Return to Zig Forums you charlatan
But I know their thoughts on this. Its always good to get both sides of every topic.
I think it's pretty much undeniable now to believe there aren't differences in eyequeue and brain size between different races, sexes, etc and to claim otherwise is very regressive and simply plays into the rightwing narrative that we are anti-science.
That being said though, all that biology shit really isn't that relevant. It doesn't change anything about how capitalism works and how it's fucking up our life. There will always be black CEOs, white CEOs, black workers, and white workers. It doesn't matter at fucking all their race, sex, gender, etc.
Thanks for the polite response.
Care to elaborate? You admit to differences in Autism Level but maintain the differences are insignificant.
complete and utter pseudoscience
What do you mean? Are you saying the studies on brain size have not been conducted correctly and cannot be relied upon?
Those differences are just averages, meaning that there will always be exceptions running in the millions. That means that any policy that excludes people from advancing in society based on race would be fundamentally unethical, and keep the black science man types down along with the dumb ones.
Basically what says, these differences in human biology depending on race, sex, etc aren't completely irrelevant but we can't let them dictate our decisions. They are just averages, there exist thousands if not millions of blacks smarter than whites for example. I think at most state sponsored compensations for people with high I Qs to have more children should be enough.
...
Are you implying that women are niggers?
This. If you want to apply some kind of eugenics to select for people with higher Autism Level, just measure everyone's Autism Level regardless of race. Stop treating people as collective identity groups rather than individuals.
This is the same mistake SJWs make.
That depends on the difference in average, and on the position being measured. I think that the difference in average intelligence is enough to lower the rate of blacks in high end positions by a significant margin.
Without getting bogged down in figures, this disparity would explain why blacks are generally poorer, and why black countries are generally less developed.
Gotta love these mods. Sure, let's anchor this thread and further the narrative that we are against biology, sure that'll really help us!
The human population is over 7 billion.
Even taking the most conservative Zig Forums-tier estimates of the difference in average Autism Level, there must still be many millions of blacks smarter than the average white.
Well to be fair, race is far more than just Autism Level.
Again, Autism Level is not everything, and is not the only difference between groups. I wasn't wanting to get into a discussion about Autism Level's so much. But it seems people here do acknowledge differences in intelligence.
Thanks for the replies.
you get banned because we have this retarded conversation with you faggots every fucking time ending up with just screeching "niggers" you can't handle the fact that socialism does not fucking care because it does not fucking matter
"hurr liberals this hurr identity that"
you are pathetic.
To be fair, this thread has almost nothing to do with communism. It's no more useful than a debate about religion or feminism.
Name a single heritable characteristic which is both important and strongly correlated with race.
In every case the variation within races is greater than the variation in racial averages.
Well the point is I think it does matter.
OK. I will leave it at this: you guys think that there is an intelligence gap, but there are still some blacks that can contribute to a white society.
I disagree because I think races differ in more than just intelligence, and the results that we see with just about every major white country being 1st world, and every major black country being 3rd world, speaks volumes. Thanks.
The correlation between brain volume and intelligence is middling at best and can be partly explained with indirect factors (taller height = bigger brain but also better overall health/nourishment which positively affects intelligence). There are extraordinarily smart people like Einstein who have average sized brains.
Race realism is like creationism in that it takes a fact in vacuum and presents it as proof that their theory is correct, without looking at it dialectically.
Yes, but that is a misleading statement. Just because a large total genetic range exists in the population ,does not mean that most people on that population are more genetically related to each other than another race.
Empathy, proclivity to violence, impulsiveness, creativity, altruism
I agree that brain size isnt everything when it comes to intelligence. But generally, a bigger brain should help. And the brain size difference in race exists after controlling for body size.
I bet this has nothing to do with historical developments and material conditions or the fact that every time countries like Ghana or Burkina Faso attempted sweeping modernization programs they were directly overthrown by Western countries.
He's saying that black women are superior because small brain makes it more energy efficient. Animals with larger brains tend to be dumb.
Also, any study or anything. I have a hard time following on from just shitposts.
female brains get warm faster if that matters at all. overclock a bad cpu.
You probably don't see it much in the US because the demographics are so mixed, but in the UK there are lots of areas which are both overwhelmingly white and full of crime/violence/neglect/etc. You have this weird notion that white societies are perfect, but they really aren't.
I don't think you understood what I meant. Pic related is how race correlates with every single meaningful attribute. There simply hasn't been the evolutionary pressure to cause divergence in brain structure to the same extent as there has for skin pigmentation.
It does the opposite. It needs a high number of gyri and sulci amont with small size to make the largest surface area kind of like cells.
You're a retarded Zig Forumsyp.
Not him, but have you got a source showing a negative correlation between brain mass and intelligence in humans? I'm genuinely curious.
...
Not what I was saying at all.
...
haha oh wow
That's because you're really fucking stupid
Honestly I really wonder if Fascists get bored of pretending to argue in good faith around places like this or if they just don't know where they are.
This isn't a place for you to pander to liberal sensibilities and pretend like you're actually interested in debate, we already scared all the liberal onlookers off because we aren't attempting to win them over by pretending we're the same only to pull back the curtain before they realise it's too late; we outline a radically different positive program, and if they bring their bullshit here we tell them to fuck off. You don't have to pretend to be respectable, all your slimy little worm tactics arent' neccessary.
This only really leaves 2 possibilities; that they either think we are also Liberals, in which case they misunderstand what Liberalism is, or it's pathological and they can't help but hand-wring and machinate regardless of whether they're seen through or not. These people are fucking narcissists whose defense mechanism is to just pretend that there is something that their opponents cannot ever know; it is a secret knowledge that only they possess, they are the holders of truth, meanwhile they continue to strive towards being named, and predictably, like their mythological jew, their reaction is the same.
Your "Truths" are dogshit, and ultimately for all your appeals to Enlightenment ideals, of the "Science" you profess affinity for as evidence to use the Liberals own Beliefs against them, you reveal yourself as pathetic creatures trying to regain valor that you never had, let alone lost, and you project all your twisted ideas onto the other, because if you aren't great, then they must be worse.
Literal children crying that they didn't get a participation medal
Since when have liberals been interested in debate? Liberals are usually the first to resort to "freeze peaches" memes.
Honestly yours looks like the most liberal post in the whole thread.
lol butthurt small brained nigger woman wrote many words
Now this is more like it lads
Hmmm? Liberals fetishize debate all of the time, thinking fascists can be converted by logic and facts and rationalwiki links. There are some liberals who protest fascists being platformed, but there are also liberals who provide the platform in the first place, in the name of the "free market of ideas".
Honestly I haven't seen this promoted by any liberals in years. A decade ago there might have been significant support for free speech among liberals, but not any more. Even the ultra-rich techno-utopian types have started supporting ideological censorship.
The BO is actually making an effort to keep this board scientific by banning garbage threads like this
This board generally uses a "European" naming scheme for political movements and ideologies. SJWs can be illiberal. You're using the Fox news version of the word "Liberal."
niggers are dumptrucks and dumbbells
buffons or boons to society
aint nobody got time fo dat
is proof positive
m.youtube.com
theres a commercial with a niggerboy larping like he knows chinese they dont speak chink