Change my mind

I don't remember what Rafiq wrote about this, but I know what Lenin did:

OP here


I guess what I'm asking is what does communism/socialism has to offer to ME
please define what you mean, quality of life can mean different things to different people.


so how is Nationalism compatible with internationalism?
by nationalism I mean that a Nation (a people) are their own masters and don't have to bow down to another people (Imperialism) like in the USSR (or modern russia too) where multiple people (Nations) are united under one country.
In regards to religion what about the "opium quote" then? And please explain how the church "waged war" against the state.


I have yet to see a single anti-surveillance political party (maybe libertarians but meh)


I agree, Hitler was a retard, most of what you listed was a direct cause of him and his stupid war. And after the war fascism barely existed.


So he does support the independence of nations. but why did they invade several countries then? and still occupied and oppressed several nations (like The ukrainians) Seems to me like he said one thing and did another

Attached: confusion.gif (532x720 1.45 MB, 52.44K)

Attached: marx engels lenin.png (738x600, 61.79K)

You will always have to make compromises with people who disagree with you user. Stepping into a common federation is the best way to arrange this.

Not being a disposable asset for the ruling class?
measurable quality of life like working conditions, clean air, good and available healthcare etc.
not shit like having a white neighbour instead of a non-white one

Attached: productivity and real wages.jpg (850x400 295.14 KB, 54.59K)

4 hour workday.
It can be a thing we just need to organize our production forces properly and make good use lf automation.

No countries can survive on their own in the modern world. Not a single one has all the natural resources available inland. A communist world would aim to distribute the resouces in a way all nations or cultural regions (since modern nations are complete fabrications, and most of them don't have a clear common history prior to unification) could have good living standards. This would efectivelly end imperialism in the whole world. Local cultures which are the only valuable thing in nationalism can survive and evolve as long as the locals want.

Look at how your local leftist party(assuming you're not American) are voting, anti-surveillance remains one of the things that the far left is against.
I'm personally member of political party that is far-left and my party has voted against it consistently.

Attached: 20 - The Place Where Justice Is Found.mkv_snapshot_12.24_[2018.04.29_11.48.21].jpg (1280x720, 91.81K)

This. The biggest union in my country supports the anti-surveillance struggle while rightists support it cause "muh terrorism"

What American leftist party supports the fucking surveillance state? I think that's pretty much universal.

What American leftist party wasn't created by the surveillance state?