Why not create an organization for the redistribution of wealth? Wouldn't that be a logical choice considering you want the redistribution of wealth? At least several celebrities are claiming to be socialist now. Wouldn't it optimal to take advantage of this virtue signalling?
You could do other things with the society like create co-operatives as well to employ your members as well as create communes for them to live at. I'm sure I'm not the first to think of this idea but why isn't it a very common idea among socialists?
So then you're communists? I thought that was the distinction between socialists and communists. At least that's what a communist told me.
Jordan Wood
why doesn't Zig Forums understand socialism lads
Cameron Roberts
Socialism is a mode of production wherein the means of production are collectively owned, and a number of ideologies belong to it (Anarchism, orthodox marxism, revisionist marxism…) That's my definition of socialism
Ryan White
Simply redistributing wealth is not the same as changing the mode of production. Contrary to what Americans may believe, welfare is not socialism.
Easton Richardson
I didn't imply that at all. Generally if you don't have money to give you don't give money.
Camden Perry
Communism is The End of History Socialism is how we get there
